hyperflutterby wrote:
well I know with my image program (GIMP) you can designate if the image "combines" or "replaces" when animating. If it combines, it is like putting another layer on top of the image with transparency, so some of the original image still shows through. When the images replace, it is more like a strip of film in a camera. Each image is complete so you look at one, then it is taken away, then you look at the next one, then it is taken away and so on.
Perhaps you image is combining instead of replacing so when the animation changes, where the ears were is still there.
Thats the kind of thing I thought! With my program (Animation Shop 3) at the beginning of creating an animation you get this option...
"When the image occupies only a part of the frame, how should the rest be filled?
With the canvas colour
With the preceding frame's contents"
Not sure if that helps or what program you've got - but you could look through the options you chose and see if you checked the wrong thing...