Tue May 09, 2006 3:53 am
Marissa wrote:Ratings Board Rules:
...
2. You must give/get ratings at a ratio of at least 1:1, that means for every graphic you ask for ratings on, you must rate at least one other. And I mean a meaningful, well-thought out rating, not just a number or "that's good."
Wed May 10, 2006 5:53 am
Wed May 10, 2006 12:20 pm
Snippy wrote:militia- It is a well drawn set.. but it's a liiiiittle bit, um... sexual. Maybe I'm wrong but that's just what I think.
Wed May 10, 2006 1:31 pm
Marissa wrote:Ratings Board Rules:
...
2. You must give/get ratings at a ratio of at least 1:1, that means for every graphic you ask for ratings on, you must rate at least one other. And I mean a meaningful, well-thought out rating, not just a number or "that's good."
Wed May 10, 2006 10:45 pm
Bangel wrote:Yes, because visible biological girl parts, even if they're perfectly covered up, are sexual and not right at all!
Fri May 12, 2006 4:01 am
Sun May 14, 2006 4:52 pm
Sun May 14, 2006 5:34 pm
Sun May 14, 2006 5:47 pm
DM was on fire! wrote:Dawn - First question is...who are they? That guy on the top left looks like Chris...anyway, you did a very good job of colourizing it. And, I LOVE that font. What is it? I really don't see too much wrong with it.
Mon May 15, 2006 12:00 am
Bangel wrote: <-Please rate.
Mon May 15, 2006 10:42 pm
Tue May 16, 2006 2:42 am
DM was on fire! wrote:
Ratings please.
(P.S.: I know the text on the signature is fuzzy. I tried to fix it, but it wouldn't fix...<<)
Wed May 17, 2006 12:50 am
Wed May 17, 2006 4:53 pm
Tue May 23, 2006 1:57 am
mayanspypilot wrote:I haven't had my most recent set rated at all. I think it's definitely the best I've made so far. Please give any comments and critiques