Display your creative spirit here in the Pink Poogle Toy Gallery. It can be art... it can be music... it can be a poem (even haiku)... but most of it... it must be you.
Topic locked

Aww...isn't she cute?

Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:33 pm

Heh. Well, what I did is I took a photo I had of my niece (professionally done by someone else), selected the flower she's holding, reverse-selected the whole thing, and b&wed it. I think it's kinda cute (But then again, she's my niece. :P ). Any comments/questions?

Image

Tue Nov 09, 2004 12:10 am

Aww! Very cute. Wondefully done as well!

Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:13 am

Heh. Thank you!

Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:29 am

You're quite welcome. ^^

Tue Nov 09, 2004 5:31 am

*squees*

Awww, she's adorable! And making the photo black and white is a nice touch, it really makes the rose stand out.

Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:05 am

You did a very good job making the flower stand out... The picture looks great!
And she's real cute too :)

Tue Nov 09, 2004 4:35 pm

I like it a lot! You niece is adorable!

One of the things you might do (you really don't have to because it looks great as is) is recolor the rose a little bit so it is pinker. You could make it look like you started with a black and white photo and colored in the rose by lightening the pink and perhaps using some kind of filter to make it look like you used water colors on the photo.

But once again you really don't need to do this I'm just suggesting it because I took 4 years of photography classes and when I look at photos, I instantly look for things that I can do to play around with them. :oops:

Tue Nov 09, 2004 5:06 pm

I'm not going to lie, as I don't like kids: so no, I don't think she's cute.

BUT the picture itself is nice, the colors on the flower add that little extra to the pic :)

Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:28 am

I find your neice adorable, she looks very cute. As for your editting, I believe you did a swell job. The rose looks professionally editted, just like one made from the companies that do senior photoes. Very, very nice work.

Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:13 am

Hmm....thanks for the advice/comments.

So hyperbutterfly, you're suggesting something more like this?

Image

Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:15 am

I think I liked the red one better, of the two.

Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:58 am

*shrugs* I dunno. I think she's still cute either way. :P Ah well.

Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:07 pm

Silja wrote:I'm not going to lie, as I don't like kids
why does that remind me of scrooge?

Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:54 pm

cat1205123 wrote:Hmm....thanks for the advice/comments.

So hyperbutterfly, you're suggesting something more like this?

Image


Kinda, let me dig up an example because I'm thinking of a certain style of photography that is really popular. It is especially done with kids holding flowers in a similar fashion.

Edit: What I was thinking of is a style of photography done by a woman named Kim Anderson, she does really good work you might want to google image search her name to see more of her work (http://images.google.com/images?q=Kim+A ... gle+Search). Anyway, this is the style I was talking about:

Image

She uses really sublte colorization on a b&w photo and achieves this really soft, whimsical feeling. She also works almost exclusively with pictures of children which contributes to that.

Edit again: The image doesn't seem to be showing up, here's a hyperlink: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v57/h ... zation.bmp

Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:09 am

Yeah...I've seen a bunch of her work. My teacher has some up in the classroom. It's pretty darn good. :P

Well, thank you for the advice. I may try something later when I have better picture to work with. *wanders off to ponder this*
Topic locked