For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:25 pm

Attention all :

My role allows me to summon a giant purple elephant to crush somebody

My role is called Stampomatic

If I can get three people to say "I want an elephant", I gain a five day immunity from being taken to the Dog Catchers

Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:46 pm

I want an elephant?

I don't know who to believe, so I'll just Vote: Qanda, Vote: Matt

Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:58 pm

I want a red, blue, green elephant! =D


I'm not so sure about the whole Qanda and Matt thing, being not able to unvote makes it harder to make a decision.

Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:05 pm

For majority's sake (and since he really is suspicious):

Vote: Matt

Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:11 pm

After thinking about it

Vote: Matt

I think all the evidance really points to him, there are too many factors to make me beleive they are all just coincedances. He even openly admits that he was probably targetted by the dreamers, and laying the blame on Qanda is just a double-bluff, in my opinion.

Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:34 pm

ScottNak wrote:And that concludes the nightly report. Rise and shine. And be sure to scour the area completely. There may be something of interest in the forest that has magically appeared in the East side of the village.

Heey... in the shock of the night everyone seems to have missed this (with the exception of Urthdigger, that is).

Any idea what significance it has?

Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:46 pm

Maybe it concerns a role? Someone who can choose to explore places that appear magically each day/ adjacent days/ every 3 days...?

Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:46 pm

I was pretty curious too, I guess we've just gotta wait. :P I like how it magically appeared.

Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:50 pm

I have to agree that all the evidence seems to point to Matt. Who else would have had the dreamers dream of the very same person? It just doesn't make much sense otherwise.

Vote: Matt

And yes, that clue thing does seem odd. Maybe there is a detective in the game? o_O

Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:10 pm

I was suspicious of Matt, but I was going to wait. I don't think it really matters now though.

Vote: Matt

Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:24 pm

Okay, I don't get this entirely....such as what a dreamer or a mason or anyone else is.I barely understand my own role, but I'm catching on..

Vote: Qanda

Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:28 pm

Guys, I think I know Matt's role. I doubt he has a way of proving it yet though. Why don't we all play a nice little card game while we ponder who to go after next ? (Unless you want to keep going with Matt. I won't vote for him but seeing how he could be faking the role I think he has, you have to make up your own mind)

RED
BLUE
GREEN
YELLOW
PURPLE
ORANGE
INVISIBLE

Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:31 pm

.:Requiem:. wrote:Okay, I don't get this entirely....such as what a dreamer or a mason or anyone else is.I barely understand my own role, but I'm catching on..

Vote: Qanda

Why are you voting for me? It seems to me that your profession of ignorance is really just a guise for you to evade the need of voting for your teammate.

Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:47 pm

Qanda wrote:
Matt wrote:Anyways, I have absoultely no evidence, but two people were most suspicious of me - Qanda and o_0. o_0 is dead, and he was the dreamer. I think that Qanda may be the nightmarer, and could maybe kill anyone who dreams of one person. He's almost encouraging people of voting for one person. Still, this hasn't got any evidence. This is also a possible theory, because the two people who dreamt of me - o_0 and Twixxy, I know out of the forum and they are much more likely to target me. People do that often.

Ok, let's break down that large chunk of paragraph to see what you were really trying to say...

Both me and o_0 suspected your motives.

o_0 died.

Hence I killed o_0.

Ooookaaay... :roll:


XDDDDD

Sorry. Ahem.

XD

Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:50 pm

Oh that's right...no unvoting. Well then, I guess it's Goodbye, Matty Tuesday...
Topic locked