WW6-A Excess (Jan. 7-9)

Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:26 am

Kalathalan wrote:Vote: No Execution

Alas, however, will you post the general roles of people? I mean, cutting out the names of the people with that role...I wanna know what roles do XP

To make it more um.....a guessing game...we're not supposed to know the roles. xD

(You have seen the last game...right? Wait..never mind.)

EDIT: And mystics find the werewolves.

Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:27 am

Bwahahahahahahhahaha!

We have a castle! I love castles! You have a smelly old cave!

And there doesn't have to be a Mystic.

Do you know what would be uber-cool? If Scott made a game with no baddies. -hugs the paranoia that would ensue-

Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:28 am

*looks at Section B*

Hmm....I've been in Section A twice. xD

Website · Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:30 am

A game with no bad guys, that would be an April Fool's Joke where almost every player was given a Vigilante Kill

haha

Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:30 am

Vote: Nobody

Right now everyone seems as good as anyone else here, unless we somehow get some proof that someone is evil then i'll change my vote. Random guessing never did anyone no good.

Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:34 am

Urth looks around at the others that had entered the castle. A few he knew, a few he didn't. "Well, looks like once again we're gonna get massacred here. I was suspicious of Wind when I heard she was going on vacation too, but seeing as she went someplace else, I don't have a clue who's suspicious."

Vote: Nobody

Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:44 am

A game with no baddies would make the innocents win straight away

Maybe a game with no innocents or a game with 1 baddy

Sat Jan 08, 2005 7:58 am

Yeah...start a game on April Fools Day and make it only vigilantes! :lol:

Or...a game with...the ratio of baddies to innocents be 20:1? xD

Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:50 pm

Split games?! YESSSSSSSSSS. I'm gonna confuse myself atleast once, though, and accidently post in game B.

It would be rather stupid to do a random vote right now, with no evidence to go by.

Vote: No execution

Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:00 pm

Gah. I'm going to get so confused by the split game.

But why is everyone voting no excution right now?

Of course, it's stupid to do a random vote but it's what? 8:00 AM? (Here at least) Like 13 hours until the excution?

Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:23 pm

AutumnElf wrote:Gah. I'm going to get so confused by the split game.

But why is everyone voting no excution right now?

Of course, it's stupid to do a random vote but it's what? 8:00 AM? (Here at least) Like 13 hours until the excution?

There is a change vote function, of course... but today I think it's best to wait.

Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:27 pm

YAY!

Gimme a W!

Gimme another W!

Gimme a 6!

Gimme an A!

WW6 A! WHOOOOOT!

I agree with a No Execution vote, there's a high chance of us getting a good person.

Vote: No Execution

Sat Jan 08, 2005 3:21 pm

Oh, wow, it started... and it would have been nice to know what section, but oh well. And no offense, but you PPT people are a bit... frightening.

Anyway, the section really isn't so big... but we would probably have an equal chance of voting off a very important role or a wolf. People with very important roles would probably let us know and not be executed, but it's not so good to tell the wolves or whatever else either... So I guess I'll agree with the no vote for today, unless something interesting comes up.

vote: none

Sat Jan 08, 2005 3:54 pm

lackadazed wrote:Oh, wow, it started... and it would have been nice to know what section, but oh well. And no offense, but you PPT people are a bit... frightening.

Don't worry. You'll soon be crazy yourself. Happens to everyone who comes to PPT. *pats*

Sat Jan 08, 2005 4:28 pm

I love you, cap. Thanks for agreeing with me, but I think you live down the lane at the old cave.

MattEdit: Deleted accidental post from cap. (Didn't know where to put this edit, so, it'll do here)