For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:36 am

Rox was evil.
Argorok was the the most awesome boss in Twilight Princess, and probably my favourit from any Zelda game.
So why'd you have to go any die, Rox? :(

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:38 am

Well done on the exection of the evilie, boo on the execution of an innocent.

oh, btw Bruces Galore is a she...

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:24 am

@Dyl: Because Tanner and Ry had to go and overpower the dreamer. :P

Go team! Rez plz!

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:52 pm

I'm mad about being killed still. I was probably one of teh most powerful innocent players too.

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:22 pm

Attacked by fire and ice, nice. Being killed on my birthday not cool :( . Oh well after the curse I figured I didn't have much longer to live. Go innocent people and very good dreamer :) Thanks Rachel for correcting ryguy on my gender though my role was a boy which could have confused things.

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:12 pm

Ammer wrote:And Rox was evil right? I can't tell by his role. I looked it up and it said he's some dragon flying around attacking cities, so I'm assuming that means bad?


Most dragons flying around attacking cities are bad, Ammer dear. ;)

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:22 pm

DM was on fire! wrote:
Ammer wrote:And Rox was evil right? I can't tell by his role. I looked it up and it said he's some dragon flying around attacking cities, so I'm assuming that means bad?


Most dragons flying around attacking cities are bad, Ammer dear. ;)



You'd think that.

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:23 pm

Katherine wrote:
DM was on fire! wrote:
Ammer wrote:And Rox was evil right? I can't tell by his role. I looked it up and it said he's some dragon flying around attacking cities, so I'm assuming that means bad?


Most dragons flying around attacking cities are bad, Ammer dear. ;)


You'd think that.


:o
inorite? ;D

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:59 am

Pixa wrote:Oh, and what does BCC do? *curious*

If you were to send a PM to August, September, and October, and put August in the To field and September and October in the BCC field:
August would only see his own name in the recipients.
September would see that August was sent the same PM and she was BCCed, meaning she knows he doesn't see her name in the recipients.
And October would see August's name and his own, but not September's.

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:42 pm

Loosing Link isn't good for the innocents. At least you finally got to be an innocent character Alex :) Actually the majority of resses in May's game came from a resser who was doubled, hopefully there is something out there that can res Alex and still have her be innocent.

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:52 pm

*cries*

Seriously, NOT cool.

To the dreamer: good luck, and hopefully some of what we planned will still work. Gutted that I was attacked - twice - though, and died :(

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:28 pm

Yea, that's right, rez ban the rezzer. Hmph.

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:11 pm

Alex wrote:*cries*

Seriously, NOT cool.

To the dreamer: good luck, and hopefully some of what we planned will still work. Gutted that I was attacked - twice - though, and died :(

Love you too, Alex.

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:24 pm

Baddies, take down all the vocal innocents. Don't forget. ;)

Re: WW35: Kakariko Village Graveyard (Groupies)

Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:19 pm

So what's up with Ethics' posting requirement and the marimba?
Topic locked