For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:09 pm

JellyFish72 wrote:Ick, gone all morning again...

Well, I can see that there are no leads yet, besides random voting, so I'm going to Vote: Vortexion, because I don't believe that s/he's posted yet... Smack me if I'm wrong though...


*smack*

vote fizzy

We need an execution and fizzy seems like the most probable choice.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:10 pm

Votes:

vortexion(1): Lady Night
Tyranus(1): Lass
Fizzy(3): Lackadazed, Bunnylover212, Cap
Trinity(1): Tyranus

23 players remain, 12 for majority 18 for lock.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:12 pm

We need a majority...

*mosheszee*


Vote: Izzywhizzylet'sget FIZZY!!!

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:12 pm

You guys are not getting my vote on Fizzy. <.<

There is not enough substantial evidence on him.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:17 pm

Tyranus wrote:You guys are not getting my vote on Fizzy. <.<

There is not enough substantial evidence on him.



Dude.


One minute you're telling us that even a RANDOM EXECUTION is good, even if we get rid of someone good.


The next minute you're telling us we can't get an execution because there's isn't evidence?



Make your mind up @_@;;

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:20 pm

Tyranus wrote:You guys are not getting my vote on Fizzy. <.<

There is not enough substantial evidence on him.


And voting for no execution is justification for death? What do you want? For us to vote for random people and not get a majority? Come on.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:26 pm

Tyranus wrote:Sorry I can't make it on all day, I have a life. <.<

Anyways, I am going to smack you all. Again.

Role playing is one of the worst sins you can commit, because it adds nothing useful to the game while cluttering up the thread, making it hard to find actual evidence. Role playing is pointless in this game, and is used as a diversion tactic from actual information.

And I'm going to vote for who started the roleplaying first.

Vote: Trinity

EDIT: Oh, and remind me to vote for Lacka and Ducky later. Incidentally, Trinity was also the first one to start the no voting, making her doubly guilty in my eyes.


"Roleplaying has nothing to do with guilt. And same with voting. Oh, Kugetsu posted first, so would that mean he's guilty? Hmm? No, it doesn't! Those facts are not substantial evidence." Trinity snapped, glaring at Tyranus.

"I was just trying roleplay to practice it, not to hide information! I wouldn't stoop that low. And if you die tonight, Tyranus, you guys," Trinity sweeped her hand, indicating all people in the room, "can blame me all you want, and execute me, but it will be a great loss for you." Trinity finished her speech and sat down in a chair.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:31 pm

Maybe Tyranus is the red herring, leading us away from Fizzy...
Nah.

There's not any substantial evidence against anyone, imo.

Fizzy seems a good a choice as anyone right now.

Vote: Fizzy

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:31 pm

First of all, a random execution on Day 1 is good, because we get to see everyone's voting styles instead of seeing everyone bandwagoning for no votes. Most likely, we would have hit an innocent, but the fact that an important innocent would have spoken up, and the fact that a normal innocent is worth much less than good looks at each and every player overweigh the fact that no voting at least doesn't make anyone die.

And I refuse to vote for Fizzy because there is that much evidence on Trinity, and the fact that Fizzy is most likely a normal innocent if he was that inactive. A horribly inactive person is almost always a normal innocent.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:44 pm

Tyranus wrote:First of all, a random execution on Day 1 is good, because we get to see everyone's voting styles instead of seeing everyone bandwagoning for no votes. Most likely, we would have hit an innocent, but the fact that an important innocent would have spoken up, and the fact that a normal innocent is worth much less than good looks at each and every player overweigh the fact that no voting at least doesn't make anyone die.

And I refuse to vote for Fizzy because there is that much evidence on Trinity, and the fact that Fizzy is most likely a normal innocent if he was that inactive. A horribly inactive person is almost always a normal innocent.



Oh...well...I suppose that makes sense *scratches head* =)

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:45 pm

Meh, your logic is a bit contradictory in some ways, but ignoring that...

In general, I've noticed that PPT games are a bit more... quiet than those at iDB, they don't often execute on the first day and there's a lot more roleplayers. So while it's not surprising... Scott's fan certainly is annoying, at least. Might not be a bad way to vote...

I didn't mean to start a bandwagon with that, just see if Fizzy showed up. Just trying to count, as one post is less than two. ;) And while it's very unlikely to be positive that she's innocent unless you have a very interesting role, busy wouldn't surprise me much either. I think I'll hold off on a vote for the moment.

unvote: Fizzy

Tyranus, shall I remind you to vote for me and Ducky? o_O

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:47 pm

Trinity quickly stood up. "I'm sorry that you prefer a random execution on Day 1, Tyranus, but I don't, on the other hand. There is not enough evidence on the first day. And like I said before, I'm just experimenting with role playing.
"Remember, if Tyranus dies tonight, blame me if you want, and you could even execute me, but it will be a GREAT loss to you all," Trinity clenched her teeth and sat back down, frowning.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:47 pm

Yes, please remind me.

Especially Ducky, because he seems to be insistent on throwing random things into conversations (e.g. red herrings) that really don't matter, which is almost like RPing.

EDIT: And if I die tonight, do NOT kill Trinity (if she hasn't been executed). No baddie is dumb enough to actually kill someone they say they're going to kill. If I die tonight, the baddies are trying to frame Trinity. Unless of course, I'm right and Trinity is bad. But even so, she won't kill me.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:55 pm

Tyranus wrote:EDIT: And if I die tonight, do NOT kill Trinity (if she hasn't been executed). No baddie is dumb enough to actually kill someone they say they're going to kill. If I die tonight, the baddies are trying to frame Trinity. Unless of course, I'm right and Trinity is bad. But even so, she won't kill me.


Um, bad thing to say while not yet dead. If Trinity is bad, she probably got the idea that she could use "but mauling Tyranus would have been a stupid thing to do!" and get away with it. But then again, wouldn't that be too obvious as well? So she wouldn't... or would she? But that's what makes it fun, I guess.

Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:58 pm

I am now on the lookout of a few people but my cousins are over, might not be back until a few mins before night. But I will get a vote in.
Topic locked