For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:35 pm
Vote: Matterbug
He's really the only suspicious person I know...*sees a squirrel* AAHHHH! Zombie Squirrel!
Alex wrote:Alex pulled a slip of paper out of the container in her head, and showed it to the hitman.
And Alex, I must congratulate you on finally being able to possess a container in your head =)
Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:29 pm
Well, seems like matterbug is the key suspect...
*stokes beard in Sherlock Holmes style*
Vote: matterbug
Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:40 pm
Vote: matterbug
Same reasons as everyone else.
Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:14 pm
I honestly can't vote for Matterbug because that would be quite hypocritical of me. I voted for silverblade first because he was inactive. It's odd why you'd vote for Matterbug when I voted for silverblade in the first place.
Now, I'm not asking to be executed, but I don't think it's fair that Matterbug takes the blame for something I started. But If you wish to punish those who voted for silver, vote for me instead.
Kugetsu wrote:which is the exact opposite of what you seem to be trying to do (have an executoion with reason behind it).
That's what you should be doing. Having a vote with reason behind. I don't believe in voting without a reason, especially one as stupid as the one many of you were using to execute Matterbug.
Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:36 pm
Mandy wrote:Looks like the randomisers going to choose. Matt's microphone has been disabled? Maybe hes a singer or something.
Lots of people have microphones, actually, Mandy dear.
And quite frankly, I don't really find Matterbug suspicious. He hasn't really done anything to make him look suspicious, in my opinion. *Shrug*
Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:46 pm
Hmm... great job whoever decided to take away my mic. <_<
Ammer, you do realize I was pointing out that voting for someone because of inactivity has no point either because he wasn't even considered inactive (people aren't inactive by the second day). It was just another baseless vote in a more decorated fashion.
Oh, and why are all of you voting for Matterbug again? o_0
Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:50 pm
Hmm... okay right now I'm really tempted to vote for him too, but I'm just not so sure yet. I'll vote for sure later, but at the moment I'm not convinced considering the fact that there really is no proof. I like voting last minute anways, that way I have all the facts, so I'll go with that for now.
Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:52 pm
Kugetsu wrote:Oh, and why are all of you voting for Matterbug again? o_0
Because 1) we haven't got any other lead and 2) I'm still not convinced by his defence.
Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:07 pm
We really need a majority or we'll end up killing off someone randomly again....
Vote: matterbug
Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:41 pm
After reading through everything the majority seems to going to matterbug so
Vote: matterbug
Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:43 pm
Kugetsu wrote:Hmm... great job whoever decided to take away my mic. <_<
Ammer, you do realize I was pointing out that voting for someone because of inactivity has no point either because he wasn't even considered inactive (people aren't inactive by the second day). It was just another baseless vote in a more decorated fashion.
No, it isn't. I vote for the inactive because even if they are good, they're not helping us anyway. I would rather play this game with active people rather than inactive people.
Plus, it would save someone who doesn't deserve to be executed such as Matterbug.
Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:12 pm
Wow, I just can't win.
All I really see are the same main reasons as before- so I really don't know what to say. I think you've got one thing on your mind- and you're not going to stop no matter how flimsy the evidence.
If you want to think I was "faking" my grief- go ahead. I honestly do feel guilty, because I didn't get on to read the part about silver usually just sending lists, until after the day was over.
We really need a majority or we'll end up killing off someone randomly again....
I don't get that logic. We either kill off someone good with a majority, or we have a chance of killing off a baddy randomly?
Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:51 pm
Ammer wrote:No, it isn't. I vote for the inactive because even if they are good, they're not helping us anyway. I would rather play this game with active people rather than inactive people.
Plus, it would save someone who doesn't deserve to be executed such as Matterbug.
Just because he doesn't post often doesn't mean he fails to send lists in. Sending lists in gauges activity (though some is probably required, but Silver does that), not posting. That's how he always seems to play.
Eeh, looks like I'll be watching what happens... I believe the people that just bandwagon without giving explanation are who we should go after (after Matterbug though, I guess).
Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:00 pm
Kugetsu wrote:Ammer wrote:No, it isn't. I vote for the inactive because even if they are good, they're not helping us anyway. I would rather play this game with active people rather than inactive people.
Plus, it would save someone who doesn't deserve to be executed such as Matterbug.
Just because he doesn't post often doesn't mean he fails to send lists in. Sending lists in gauges activity (though some is probably required, but Silver does that), not posting. That's how he always seems to play.)
You seem to be under the impression that I know how he plays. I've only seen him play one or two Werewolf games. And how do we know these lists are good?
I don't know, I just don't think it's fair to execute someone when it was primarly my fault.
Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:14 pm
Mo- I don't think there is any reason to vote for youAmmer just because you first voted for silver. It's not like you was forcing me to vote that way or anything. I am just as much at fault as you Ammer, so don't feel bad about it at all.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.