For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:14 am

So this is what you get for trying to help? :( I just PMed him telling him to check because DiscordantNote told ppl to contact him, and (I think) I was the only one at that time who is a member of Randomness, so I PMed clucky.

Ammer wrote:Considering sirclucky is good and he has said CW is bad or at least acting that way, I will be voting for you.

Does that mean you'll execute whoever I say if I turn out to be an innocent?

Monique wrote:There's a very good chance discordantenote really is good so I don't want to risk voting for her. Also, I know JayJay is good, so I'm obviously not going to vote for him and we need a majority, so at this point my only real option is Vote: CW

That's not your only option. You're supposed to vote for whoever you like, not just those people the first few voters voted for.

DiscordantNote wrote:I trust what sirclucky says.

You told me to PM him and now you're voting me for PMing him?

jellyoflight wrote:CW always was a shady character...*scratches beard*

When was I ever shady? I'm just getting myself killed every game. :roll:

WIS wrote:CW doesnt survive well does he?

It's not my fault! :cry: [/b]
Last edited by CWisgood on Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:16 am

CW, you got my name wrong. :P

This is the best defense I've heard from him, I think. And there weren't much reason to begin with.

Unvote: CWisGood

Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:25 am

I dunno why but i have a feeling that Ammer is evil or something. Even when we had "evidence" of matterbug being evil, he still didn't vote for him. Maybe that be that he didn't want to seem hypocritical since he did defend matterbug in the first place. But at the same time maybe he was apart of the gofer team and such. I'm not gonna vote just yet, but just wanted to say that. I dunno if it means much or i'm just paranoid.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:58 am

Ah finished my last major project today! Sorry for the inactivity, but I'm back! Got to do some catching up on some of the reading. As of now I obviously can't vote, so I'll hold it until I fully catch up as to what’s going on.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:04 am

CWisgood wrote:
DiscordantNote wrote:I trust what sirclucky says.

You told me to PM him and now you're voting me for PMing him?

True, but I meant in a way besides PM. The idea was to get him online to read it, and PMs aren't very efficient in doing that. Oh well, i propbably should've specified. In the mean time...

Unvote: CW

Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:52 am

hmmm...I'm thinking someone who has the power to take away the Mic's might be someone i know...or at least have chatted with a few times...must think about this some more...wonder if this is an innocent ability or a baddie ability...

Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:58 am

CWisgood wrote:
Ammer wrote:Considering sirclucky is good and he has said CW is bad or at least acting that way, I will be voting for you.

Does that mean you'll execute whoever I say if I turn out to be an innocent?


Not precisely. Sirclucky was saying you were pushing him to clear Matterbug was innocent when perhaps you were pushing Sirclucky into thinking that Matterbug was good even if Matterbug was lying.

Yes, sounds confusing but that's how my mind works.

I dunno why but i have a feeling that Ammer is evil or something. Even when we had "evidence" of matterbug being evil, he still didn't vote for him. Maybe that be that he didn't want to seem hypocritical since he did defend matterbug in the first place. But at the same time maybe he was apart of the gofer team and such. I'm not gonna vote just yet, but just wanted to say that. I dunno if it means much or i'm just paranoid.


That wasn't evidence. That was pure guessing. And if I was a truly a gopher, why would I want to be executed instead of Matterbug? Would I try to defend him and give up if it's hopeless? What's the point in letting myself die too so easily if I was a gopher?

I knew backing Matterbug up was going to be a risk but I took it.
Last edited by Ammer on Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:58 am

Lady Night's microphone has been disabled. She may not vote today.

Day 5 votes:

No execution – (1): DM was on Fire!

CWisgood – (6) sirclucky, Wind, Monique, Ammer, jellyoflight, Mandy,
JayJay – (1): DracolordII

There are 23 players alive.
12 votes are needed for majority.

<hr>

My friends are talking me out after work, and I have no idea what time I'll get home - I'm probably staying at one of their houses. I probably won't be in the best state to post results anyway, so I'm extending this day 24 hours so it will finish Saturday at 1:45AM NST, instead of Friday. Sorry for the delay :) I'll accept list up til then, however.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:00 am

Ammer wrote:
CWisgood wrote:
Ammer wrote:Considering sirclucky is good and he has said CW is bad or at least acting that way, I will be voting for you.

Does that mean you'll execute whoever I say if I turn out to be an innocent?


Not precisely. Sirclucky was saying you were pushing him to clear Matterbug was innocent when perhaps you were pushing Sirclucky into thinking that Matterbug was good even if Matterbug was lying.

Yes, sounds confusing but that's how my mind works.

I'm not pushing him. I just PMed him and told him to check his PM to clear MAtterbug (if he's an innocent).

Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:01 am

CWisgood wrote:
Ammer wrote:
CWisgood wrote:
Ammer wrote:Considering sirclucky is good and he has said CW is bad or at least acting that way, I will be voting for you.

Does that mean you'll execute whoever I say if I turn out to be an innocent?


Not precisely. Sirclucky was saying you were pushing him to clear Matterbug was innocent when perhaps you were pushing Sirclucky into thinking that Matterbug was good even if Matterbug was lying.

Yes, sounds confusing but that's how my mind works.

I'm not pushing him. I just PMed him and told him to check his PM to clear MAtterbug (if he's an innocent).


Sirclucky was making it sound like that way.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:08 am

O.o *stares*

*watches Cwisgood's arguments fly past* *watches everybody's else fly in a different direction* *stares at the wall*

ALEX!!! Can't I have my own trailer to hide in?

*sees Alex isn't there* *sigh*

Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:34 am

I do find it interesting that there were no deaths the past two nights, either someone is really inactive or shields and protection is going very well.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:05 am

I swear to y'all, as Sirclucky said, I'm not evil. I have an innocent role, I just truly haven't had time to use it yet. I barely have time to check on here once a day, lately. I'll use it tonight. I'll tell it to anyone who ask's.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:17 am

Vote:Kalathalan Why because it's a random vote, and he isn't a confirmed innocent, so he could be a baddie. If you are a innocent pm someone thats a confirmed innocent so i can change my vote.

Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:47 am

I believe in CW's defence, at least for the moment. It sounds like CW's usual over-enthusiastic style. Jayjay, on the other hand, has not defended himself at all, though he promised to "catch up" hours ago. My vote stays on him.
Topic locked