For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:26 pm

Question regarding today's execution method:

Can we have some clarification as to 'person with least votes will be executed' please? The way I'm reading it, there's 2 distinct possibilities:
- Player(s) have 0 votes on them. This is technically the least amount of votes.
- Player(s) have 1 vote on them. Least amount of votes logged.

Which one is it?

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:44 pm

Least amount of votes - i.e. the person with less votes than anyone else. Zero votes is an acceptable number; if I were someone, I certainly wouldn't want zero votes today. :)

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:13 pm

Vote: Christopher

Never trusted that guy for a second. Quick, lets start a bandwagon.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:42 pm

Vote; Ethics


she's a major *removed*

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:48 pm

Seems to me that the dreamer should be looking at Alex tonight, unless there's some other lead to follow...I'd really rather not completely discount the possibility of a rez-convert simply because Alex assures us she's not evil :P

Vote: Pipsqueeek

'Cause you voted me, and I don't know why.

Vote: weee5067

Since everyone else seems to be voting for themselves, I guess I might as well.

Beyond that...I guess I'll wait and see who else needs a vote later on.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:45 pm

Oh, we can vote for ourselves? Well then :P

Unvote: Miyu
Vote: pipsqueeek
:)

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:18 pm

Vote: Pixa

Looking out for me? How could that be a bad thing? :o

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:04 pm


Alex - Christopher, Anvil, Pink, Helena, Pickles
Anvil - Malibu, Regan
Malibu - Malibu, Anvil
Apex - Anvil
weee5067 - Pipsqueeek, weee5067
Pixa - Pipsqueeek
Loser1921 - Helena
Helena - Helena
Siniri - Siniri
Pickles - Pickles
Regan - Regan
Christopher - Christopher
Ethics - Ethics
Pipsqueeek - weee5067, Pipsqueeek
Pixa - Pixa
averly - 0
Chipper - 0
Hansy - 0
JellyFish72 - 0
Laryxler - 0
Missy! - 0
Miyu - 0
Pink - 0
Raz - 0
Twizzler0171 - 0
WIS - 0

Recall that I said "person or persons with the least number of votes". As of right now, everyone with zero votes would be executed. Execution in five hours. I certainly didn't expect this. :roll:

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:21 pm

Vote: Alex
Vote: Anvil
Vote: JellyFish72


Why? Because I don't really want to be executed. *nods*

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:28 pm

Vote: Alex
Vote: Twizzler0171
Vote: Chipper


Alex because I'm really hoping she wasn't brought back as Dark Link; Twizzler0171 because... well... she's me; and Chipper 'cause I know she'll vote me back. :D

EDIT: Yay! Game start again. <3

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:28 pm

vote: Anvil
vote: Apex
vote: Alex


I really hope you aren't Dark Link. Otherwise I'll feel awfully dumb.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:36 pm

Jno has replaced Missy!.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:05 am

Actually...

Unvote: Pixa
Unvote: pipsqueeek
Vote: Miyu
Vote: WIS


For reasons. Which may or may not become evident tonight.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:25 am

Vote: Jno

I don't see the point in about 10 people voting one person (especially when we don't know if they're even innocent) when there are others who have no votes on them and are at risk of being executed. Voting Jno because it would suck to die just as you replace someone.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:29 am

malibu wrote:I don't see the point in about 10 people voting one person (especially when we don't know if they're even innocent) when there are others who have no votes on them and are at risk of being executed.


I was about to post something to that effect, but you beat me to it :P I very much agree - at least a few of the people with votes on Alex must have at least a slight reason to think that one of the no-vote people is innocent, so why waste their vote on someone who's in no danger of being executed?

For my last vote,

Vote: averly

...Because executing this many people is ridiculous, and she's at the top of the list alphabetically :P
Topic locked