Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:56 pm
I'm swaying more to the arguement he may be evil.
Notice how there were two deaths last night? Wouldn't there be three?
Of course, sometimes, baddies don't send in lists, but this far into the game...
I think my vote will be staying.
It's an easy role to pass off, we shall see though, we shall see.
Notice how there were two deaths last night? Wouldn't there be three?
Of course, sometimes, baddies don't send in lists, but this far into the game...
I think my vote will be staying.
It's an easy role to pass off, we shall see though, we shall see.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:05 pm
Anubis wrote:Anoohilator wrote:A bit of advice - don't base ANY decisions completely on trust
WW is a lying game. Of course I don't. But, to me, and to a few others, Jamie's role seems semi-convincing, at least.
Kuge... I don't know about that, to be honest, but Nick wouldn't be a perfect healer, would he?
He did go to Upstairs Medical College
Anyway, I still don't know where I stand in this. But even if we have a healer that may end up killing people, is that something we want to keep? It is a bit of a risk.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:05 pm
Pixa wrote:Notice how there were two deaths last night? Wouldn't there be three?
That's a fair point. Maybe the baddie is a lurking inactive. I don't know. -shrug-
Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:10 pm
Well, from being Mafia in my first Scott game, anyone could send in a list. I'm sure that a similar thing would happen here.
I also agree with Kuge, it seems odd to have a 100% protector, and one that can kill, not just fail.
I also agree with Kuge, it seems odd to have a 100% protector, and one that can kill, not just fail.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:23 pm
If there is a baddie who is inactive, wouldn't it be Dranzer? Scott noted that she wasn't answering the ACQ's lately and considering there is a death being missed last night, I suppose it could be her?
Vote: (*Dranzer*)
Vote: (*Dranzer*)
Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:27 pm
I really don't see why Pixa has a reason to lie. If he is lying, we can go after him tommorow?
Vote: Jamie
Vote: Jamie
Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:15 pm
Ammer wrote:If there is a baddie who is inactive, wouldn't it be Dranzer? Scott noted that she wasn't answering the ACQ's lately and considering there is a death being missed last night, I suppose it could be her?
Vote: (*Dranzer*)
To be honest, you're right. I have no reason to suspect Pixa anymore, as all of us don't know whether Jamie is really innocent or not. He may be a baddie because he killed, although he might still be good and killed by accident.
Unvote: Pixa
Vote: (*Dranzer*)
Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:49 pm
Jamie - 8 - Pixa, Matt, Anoohilator, Monique, Kugetsu, Khristian, Wind, matterbug
Stephanie - 1 - Jamie
Dranzer - 2 - Ammer, Anubis
Stephanie - 1 - Jamie
Dranzer - 2 - Ammer, Anubis
Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:01 pm
I only missed Two ACQs if I recall correctly. I've been stuck with Cross Country (I Hate my coach, Scott can confirm that 
) so I've had little time to post.
Random Vote:matterbug
*Going in to rp mode* I need a drink Going to Moe's Tavern
) so I've had little time to post.
Random Vote:matterbug
*Going in to rp mode* I need a drink Going to Moe's Tavern
Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:18 pm
Well, Anubis revealed my role. I wouldn't have done that myself, but whatever. I told her that my success rate rate was 75% when Christopher was alive. When he (as in, Lisa) died, I lost 25% on my success rate. Remember when Lisa helped Nick operate on her dad? Hence my reasoning to bring her back, if you look back a few pages. My success rate is 75% while she is alive, and 50% while she is dead. Unfortunately, this has negative side effects, as you might have noticed.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:23 pm
Unvote: Jamie
Vote: Breakthrough
I'd hate to see Jamie being killed, and finding out he was another goodie, like I have done so many times before.
I will vote Breakthrough because she hasn't posted a lot on this board and I think she might be keeping quiet on purpose.
Vote: Breakthrough
I'd hate to see Jamie being killed, and finding out he was another goodie, like I have done so many times before.
I will vote Breakthrough because she hasn't posted a lot on this board and I think she might be keeping quiet on purpose.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:24 pm
If anyone wants to IM me for some proof of innocence, I'm more than welcome.
But I am NOT revealing my role. Last game I did, I got knocked off before fully using my character. *Pulls out quick quotes quill*
But I am NOT revealing my role. Last game I did, I got knocked off before fully using my character. *Pulls out quick quotes quill*
Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:52 pm
Unvote: Breakthrough
Vote: Ammer
Don't take this personally I have a tiny voice in my head telling me that you are evil..
If you're really innocent then I'm sure this won't worry you
Vote: Ammer
Don't take this personally I have a tiny voice in my head telling me that you are evil..
If you're really innocent then I'm sure this won't worry you
Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:54 pm
Why, because she's saying I'm evil? People do that all the time, so why make that I reason? I'm not gonna hate Ammer for voting me, she did what anyone who likes the game would try to do: kick out inactive players so they don't bog down the active ones.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:59 pm
If Jamie is Nick, then that's a role we really do not want to lose. I presume any dreamers out there could fill us (via Pixa) in tomorrow, but in the mean time, I'm going to vote for a random person, becuase I really don't think we want to risk killing a protector...
Unvote: Jamie
Vote: Robert
Sorry Rob, first name I remembered, but it shouldn't affect votes anyways.
Unvote: Jamie
Vote: Robert
Sorry Rob, first name I remembered, but it shouldn't affect votes anyways.