WW6-A Excess (Jan. 7-9)

[o_0]

Unvote: No execution
Vote: YesItIsh
Vote: Jellyoflight

Just giving the person who chooses the option of killing someone if we do not reach a majority. xP You know I love condemning people.

[Kalathalan]

o_0, a No Execution has been locked.

[o_0]

Oh, just great. xD I make a bigger fool of myself. But I know everyone loves the court jester. -juggles balls- I thought it said NO EXECUTION NOT LOCKED. xD

[TDG]

*swoops down and pops one of o_0s juggling balls*

CRAWWW

[Xandra]

Alright. So, who to suspect. Anyone here acting suspicious? Well, let's just get it over with. Everyone who is a danger to the innocents, raise your hand. *Watches a few people raise their hands* Drat, I couldn't see their faces.

Well then, we'll have to do this the hard way- guess.

I say we vote someone out. I, personally, hate it when there's no execution. The villains get to kill, while we innocents do nothing? Rather silly, in my opinion. We still have plenty of time before execution to think this through. =)

[TDG]

Voting is locked now. I'm all for first day executions but I know from previous games here and on IDB that if the group doesn't want one then we won't get one

Errr...I mean SQUAWK!!

[AutumnElf]

Gah. I hate no executions. We let the bad guys (most likely) kill innocents, and we make no effort to try to kill a bad guy?

[Rissa]

Gah. I hate no executions. We let the bad guys (most likely) kill innocents, and we make no effort to try to kill a bad guy?

But what else can we do? Until some of those 'bad guys' do something to raise suspicion, it's better to not vote for anyone at all, lest you risk killing an innocent.

[jellyoflight]

*runs around screaming* ALEEEEXXXX!

Gal, you mush come online when I'm actually online instead of when I'm sleeping

Anywaay...ontopic...


o_0, could you please tell me how I'm suspicious?

[Urthdigger]

Urth chuckled when some of the people raised their hands, but like Alex he didn't see their faces. "I know I may be suspicious" he said "But trust me, killing me would be a bad idea. I can help the innocents a lot, and most of the bad guys. Just making sure you guys don't shoot yourself in the foot by shooting me."

[Squinchy]

Gah. I hate no executions. We let the bad guys (most likely) kill innocents, and we make no effort to try to kill a bad guy?

But what else can we do? Until some of those 'bad guys' do something to raise suspicion, it's better to not vote for anyone at all, lest you risk killing an innocent.

Yeeah--What if we end up executing a dreaming or protector role?

*tries to juggle one ball but drops it on her foot and trips over a spooky tree root to get it*

[lackadazed]

After a lot of games, I think it's safe to say that executing someone on the first day tends not to worth out too well, statistically. It's gone well probably less than twice in all the idb games... people tend to just go for whoever's annoying or not online...

Forgot to mention that having no execution locked looks a bit odd. Ah well.

[o_0]

Bwahahahaha. Jelly, you're suspicious because my magic random number generator chose you. I love randomness. xD

[AutumnElf]

Gah. I hate no executions. We let the bad guys (most likely) kill innocents, and we make no effort to try to kill a bad guy?

But what else can we do? Until some of those 'bad guys' do something to raise suspicion, it's better to not vote for anyone at all, lest you risk killing an innocent.

Fine.

But it just drags the game out longer ><

[Bangel]

Gah. I hate no executions. We let the bad guys (most likely) kill innocents, and we make no effort to try to kill a bad guy?

But what else can we do? Until some of those 'bad guys' do something to raise suspicion, it's better to not vote for anyone at all, lest you risk killing an innocent.

Fine.

But it just drags the game out longer ><

One day isn't going to hurt anybody.