Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:07 pm
Yeah it is sort of like the Antz and A Bug's Life debate. Who had the idea first doesn't matter. What matters is what you SEE first. If you see something first then you think the other thing is a copy in your mind even if it was thought of first. So basically, if you have a good idea make sure no one knows about it on the outside. But I guess that is near enough to impossible. They'd have to build their own area 51 if they wanted to do that. But even then you can't stop someone from running their mouth. You can threaten to fire them, but you can't threaten them with death....yet...
Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:08 pm
the animation doesnt look to good.. i mean, look at the giraffes face....
either way, im not gonna see it...
either way, im not gonna see it...
Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:09 am
Christopher wrote:Well the head of Pixar can just spend a tiny amount of his 11 billion and create a new studio called 'Pixra', fire everybody working at Pixar and replace them, then rehire them at Pixra
That wouldn't work.
(Especially considering that Pixar focuses on computer-generated animation: render farms are very much expensive, and are not something you can aquire in a blink of an eye.)
Fri Jan 27, 2006 12:12 pm
As people have stated before, Disney's "The Wild" was in production before "Madagascar" was. Dreamworks simply got wind of the idea and produced a crappy movie to make Disney look bad.
Honestly, it's like your taking your time writing a book; someone gets the gist of what you're writing about and release a book about the same exact concept but with a different storyline.
Either way, I would perhaps see this film. I think it's quite pathetic that Dreamworks is copying Disney.
Honestly, it's like your taking your time writing a book; someone gets the gist of what you're writing about and release a book about the same exact concept but with a different storyline.
Either way, I would perhaps see this film. I think it's quite pathetic that Dreamworks is copying Disney.
Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:26 pm
I see nothing wrong with it.
By the way, I'm directing this new movie called "Finding Nina", about this adorable little swordfish who gets separated from her father...
By the way, I'm directing this new movie called "Finding Nina", about this adorable little swordfish who gets separated from her father...
Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:05 pm
Fiddelysquat wrote:I see nothing wrong with it.
By the way, I'm directing this new movie called "Finding Nina", about this adorable little swordfish who gets separated from her father...
OMG! Can I play Rory? A cute but amnesiatic tuna fish?
Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:04 pm
ahoteinrun wrote:Fiddelysquat wrote:I see nothing wrong with it.
By the way, I'm directing this new movie called "Finding Nina", about this adorable little swordfish who gets separated from her father...
OMG! Can I play Rory? A cute but amnesiatic tuna fish?
Sorry, but we already have Cory, a sea cucumber with narcilepsy.
Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:06 pm
it's the movie business so they should be copying lol. to me every indian movie(as in actual indian movie, made in bolywood) it the same thing, so they change some things but the story line is the same. here's the storyline:
girl/guy meet
girl.guy fall in love
girl/guy fight
girl/guy get back together
girl/guy get married
it's always something like that.
girl/guy meet
girl.guy fall in love
girl/guy fight
girl/guy get back together
girl/guy get married
it's always something like that.