They won't get away with it.

alien · **Posted:** Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:30 pm

Paul wrote:

thelilbear wrote:

Shoyru_Lover wrote:

Hmm - on the flip side, imagine how many prank calls they get - there's always two sides to a story - poor kid.

Yes, but isn't it their job to follow up on all of them? I mean, it's not like they were dragging their out there, all they had to do was send an officer.

Not always. If they sent an officer/ambulance to every prank call, I'm quite sure a lot more people would be endangered from robberies, house fires, break ins, etc.

but after calling twice, wouldnt you think the operaters would forget about the prank call and send someone over to help?

pipsqueeek · **Posted:** Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:55 pm

alien wrote:

but after calling twice, wouldnt you think the operaters would forget about the prank call and send someone over to help?

Wasn't it two different people though? They wouldn't have known that the kid had called twice. Though I still think the dispatchers were all kinds of stupid and should be punished a lot harder than they were. I mean, how many five year olds prank call?

Paul · **Posted:** Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:15 am

pipsqueeek wrote:

Wasn't it two different people though? They wouldn't have known that the kid had called twice. Though I still think the dispatchers were all kinds of stupid and should be punished a lot harder than they were. I mean, how many five year olds prank call?

How did they know the kid was five years old? The dispatchers could've thought they were any age up to 8 years old. Which makes the probability that it is a prank call much higher in the eyes of the operators.

Hunter Lupe · **Posts:** 1140 **Joined:** Mon May 31, 2004 1:36 pm

Approriate resolution, I think.

Paul wrote:

How did they know the kid was five years old? The dispatchers could've thought they were any age up to 8 years old. Which makes the probability that it is a prank call much higher in the eyes of the operators.

8 year olds tend to... you know... make coherent sentences and reply properly to questions.

Paul · **Posted:** Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:43 am

Hunter Lupe wrote:

Approriate resolution, I think.

Paul wrote:

How did they know the kid was five years old? The dispatchers could've thought they were any age up to 8 years old. Which makes the probability that it is a prank call much higher in the eyes of the operators.

8 year olds tend to... you know... make coherent sentences and reply properly to questions.

Sure they can, but so can my five year old sister. (Okay, six in August, but my point still stands.)

Pink Poogle Toy Forum

They won't get away with it.

Who is online