Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:03 pm
Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:54 pm
Sat Dec 17, 2005 5:55 pm
Bangel wrote:DM was on fire! wrote:I am NOT proud of the fact my church isn't having Christmas services though. <__<
Your sure that's a church and not a Walmart?
Christmas is a holy day of obligation if you're a Christian, no church should not have services.
Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:57 pm
Wind wrote:I celebrate the winter solstice and the new year, but my family celebrates Xmas, so I'll get my presents on the 25th.
Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:28 pm
skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Bangel wrote:DM was on fire! wrote:I am NOT proud of the fact my church isn't having Christmas services though. <__<
Your sure that's a church and not a Walmart?
Christmas is a holy day of obligation if you're a Christian, no church should not have services.
holy day of obligation? maybe that church realized that xmas has no biblical basis and decided to stop the charade. quite progressive.
Sun Dec 18, 2005 12:23 am
Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:52 am
Sun Dec 18, 2005 12:02 pm
Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:07 pm
Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:26 pm
Sun Dec 18, 2005 4:22 pm
Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Bangel wrote:DM was on fire! wrote:I am NOT proud of the fact my church isn't having Christmas services though. <__<
Your sure that's a church and not a Walmart?
Christmas is a holy day of obligation if you're a Christian, no church should not have services.
holy day of obligation? maybe that church realized that xmas has no biblical basis and decided to stop the charade. quite progressive.
Just because Christmas has no "biblical basis" doesn't mean they can't celebrate it.
Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:12 pm
wildkitten wrote:I celebrate present-giving, with a hint of family-togetherness and joy.
I don't think that commercialised Christmas should be called something else - everyone knows about the origins of the religious Christmas. Christmas, like Easter, has evolved and become something for everyone. It's good to know how the holiday came about and why it's called that, and good that it's something for everyone rather than having seperate things for seperate (non)religious groups. Better to have everyone together celebrating different things on the same day than people having to be seperate and celebrate things seperately.
Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:24 pm
PuddingofEvil wrote:
Oh, and Festivus. See you at the feats of strength!
Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:09 pm
Forest_Majesty wrote:PuddingofEvil wrote:
Oh, and Festivus. See you at the feats of strength!
-laughs hysterically!-
I suppose I better set up my pole
Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:01 am
skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Bangel wrote:DM was on fire! wrote:I am NOT proud of the fact my church isn't having Christmas services though. <__<
Your sure that's a church and not a Walmart?
Christmas is a holy day of obligation if you're a Christian, no church should not have services.
holy day of obligation? maybe that church realized that xmas has no biblical basis and decided to stop the charade. quite progressive.
Just because Christmas has no "biblical basis" doesn't mean they can't celebrate it.
of course they can! but they certainly aren't obligated to.