Mon Dec 19, 2005 4:43 am
Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Bangel wrote:DM was on fire! wrote:I am NOT proud of the fact my church isn't having Christmas services though. <__<
Your sure that's a church and not a Walmart?
Christmas is a holy day of obligation if you're a Christian, no church should not have services.
holy day of obligation? maybe that church realized that xmas has no biblical basis and decided to stop the charade. quite progressive.
Just because Christmas has no "biblical basis" doesn't mean they can't celebrate it.
of course they can! but they certainly aren't obligated to.
Actually, celebrating, what is in the eyes of the Church, Christ's Birthday, it generally is necessary. I believe so, anyway.
Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:35 am
Forest_Majesty wrote:Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Bangel wrote:DM was on fire! wrote:I am NOT proud of the fact my church isn't having Christmas services though. <__<
Your sure that's a church and not a Walmart?
Christmas is a holy day of obligation if you're a Christian, no church should not have services.
holy day of obligation? maybe that church realized that xmas has no biblical basis and decided to stop the charade. quite progressive.
Just because Christmas has no "biblical basis" doesn't mean they can't celebrate it.
of course they can! but they certainly aren't obligated to.
Actually, celebrating, what is in the eyes of the Church, Christ's Birthday, it generally is necessary. I believe so, anyway.
I agree, the no "Biblical Basis" got me a little off. Christmas is a religous holiday, for some, and for others it is a commercial holiday. Either way, Christmas is Christmas because it is Christ's Birthday and a Holy Day of Obligation, in Christian Churches.
Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:42 am
skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Forest_Majesty wrote:Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Paul wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Bangel wrote:DM was on fire! wrote:I am NOT proud of the fact my church isn't having Christmas services though. <__<
Your sure that's a church and not a Walmart?
Christmas is a holy day of obligation if you're a Christian, no church should not have services.
holy day of obligation? maybe that church realized that xmas has no biblical basis and decided to stop the charade. quite progressive.
Just because Christmas has no "biblical basis" doesn't mean they can't celebrate it.
of course they can! but they certainly aren't obligated to.
Actually, celebrating, what is in the eyes of the Church, Christ's Birthday, it generally is necessary. I believe so, anyway.
I agree, the no "Biblical Basis" got me a little off. Christmas is a religous holiday, for some, and for others it is a commercial holiday. Either way, Christmas is Christmas because it is Christ's Birthday and a Holy Day of Obligation, in Christian Churches.
jehovah's witnesses are christian and they don't celebrate xmas, because it has no biblical basis. there really isn't any "obligation" because christians aren't commanded to celebrate christ's birth anywhere in the bible, nor was jesus born on dec 25.
but i'm not trying to start a religious argument. that's what the debate forum is for.
Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:19 pm
 
			
		Mon Dec 19, 2005 2:12 pm
Mon Dec 19, 2005 4:43 pm
Igg wrote:Jehovah's witnesses are so boring.
Trick wrote:I thought the mainstream view was that while Christians will celebrate the birth of Jesus on the 25th December it is only because it is a handy date (that coincided with an existing festival - and yes I'm understating that, hee) but is known to not actually be the exact date.
 
			
		Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:40 pm
skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:Igg wrote:Jehovah's witnesses are so boring.
the little smileface at the end does not make that an acceptable thing to say. it is inappropriate for you to make fun of any religion.
Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:39 pm
skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:just because they're not "mainstream" does not give you the right to call them boring. nor does it make their beliefs invalid. i was a JW for many years and they study the bible very closely.
Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:27 pm
skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:just because they're not "mainstream" does not give you the right to call them boring.
Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:14 am
Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:11 am
Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:13 am
Sat Dec 24, 2005 2:07 pm
jeff79 wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:just because they're not "mainstream" does not give you the right to call them boring.
Actually that poster does have the right to say that... just as I have the right to say that Lord Of The Rings is boring even though a lot of people would disagree with me. You may not think JW are boring but that's an opinion of yours as Igg had an opinion also.
Sat Dec 24, 2005 2:28 pm
Sat Dec 24, 2005 2:51 pm
Igg wrote:While I'm here, gay is a virus that needs to be eradicated.
