Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:41 pm
Iron Chef Tacobell wrote:I just added another factory.
Would someone please click the link for my Minicity in my sig? my unemployment is at 4% as I type this. Thanks.
Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:50 pm
Iron Chef Tacobell wrote:I just added another factory.
Would someone please click the link for my Minicity in my sig? my unemployment is at 4% as I type this. Thanks.
Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:12 pm
Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:31 pm
Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:47 am
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:25 pm
Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:46 pm
Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:21 pm
Twinkle wrote:I think we should add more population too. Then we can see what needs work. Like, get to a certain number and then start adding roads and factories and stuff.
Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:54 pm
1% isn't too bad, but it seems to me that what we're trying to do is to make sure everything is perfect - transportation at 100%, unemployment at 0%, etc. - and then if everything is peachy we add people.Pickles wrote:Twinkle wrote:I think we should add more population too. Then we can see what needs work. Like, get to a certain number and then start adding roads and factories and stuff.
Thing is, if we add too much population, we'll never catch up with the roads. I've got this feeling that when we get to 300, we're going to need to get security taken care of quickly, or bad things might start happening...of course, I could be wrong.![]()
I think we're getting close to the point where we'll start seeing that 100% start to drop - there's a lot fewer places that need roads now!
Also, if unemployment (lack of factories) gets too high, people start leaving.
Edit: 250 people, rank 224, but unemployment just went to 1%.
Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:21 pm
Metatwaddle wrote:1% isn't too bad, but it seems to me that what we're trying to do is to make sure everything is perfect - transportation at 100%, unemployment at 0%, etc. - and then if everything is peachy we add people.
Which means we need to check this thread before deciding which link to choose, and people who are clicking should post in the thread with stats and recommendations.
Right?
Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:44 pm
I dunno. I've looked at cities ranked higher than ours and they all have 86% transportation or higher with low unemployment, criminality and pollution. I think 100% transport is good.Pickles wrote:The %'s from what I've gathered is an indication of a need: if it's at 0%, that's good. 100% is bad. In the case of transportation, there is a HUGE need for all the roads to be built. On the positive side, we haven't seen people leave over road conditions, but yeah - some of those poor people don't even have a dirt path to their houses.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong about 100% transport being bad.
Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:46 pm
Metatwaddle wrote:I dunno. I've looked at cities ranked higher than ours and they all have 86% transportation or higher with low unemployment, criminality and pollution. I think 100% transport is good.
Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:52 pm
Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:50 pm
Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:17 am