Igg wrote:
Bob wrote:
I saw Persepolis and wasn't impressed, if I'm honest. Don't be too easily swayed by nerdy art-noir students, reactionary revolutionists and wannabe critics is all I'll say.
Well gee golly mister, I don't actually get my film opinions from other people!
Bob wrote:
I have yet to see Happy-Go-Lucky as I can't get my mitts on a copy as yet
It's pretty good, but what would you really expect? It's not classic Mike Leigh though, as the title may suggest
It's a bit tenuous at times; the main character is bloody annoying and sometimes you think one of the other characters would have just hit her.
Don't get your gander up Igg, I'm not suggesting you do get your movie opinions from someone else, but if you're not swayed by people's opinions that you respect, then you're not really human, or just not really listening. Also, I am sure you're already aware that you will never learn anything unless you're prepared to open your ears to receive opinion and not just open your mouth to offer it, assuming it's from the right sources, of course.
All I'm saying is that the general consensus from the groups mentioned maintains that Persepolis is a good, nay great, film. If you have come to that conclusion on your own, then all power to you and I am very happy you enjoyed it. Not everybody agrees with that opinion, however. Like In Bruges, we may disagree, but as we are referencing Art, neither of us can be denied the opinion we hold.