Sat Jul 23, 2005 4:27 am
Smart Duck wrote:Setekh wrote:on the other hand, i somhow doubt that the naming of Horace is incidental.
im thinking she drew ideas from the god Horus... the avenger
im taking bets that its Horace that bumps off ol Snape, or prehaps otherwise avenges somone.
possibly Sirius (killing Bellatrix)
at the moment anything he could do would be incidental, but then, its rather a habit of ... the writer (drawing a total blank right now ) to do stuff all sneaky like.
still, i think theres more than coincedance in his name.
Who's Horace?
Sat Jul 23, 2005 4:59 am
.:Compact Disk:. wrote:jellyoflight wrote:Anubis wrote:To be honest, I haven't read this thread through. I'm just going to post what I think will happen.
I think that Harry is the horcrux. Voldemort was going to kill Harry to create another horcrux, but instead he made it with Harry's parent's bodies, which is why blood protects Harry. This means that Harry must destroy all the horcruxes and then kill himself after killing Voldemort, which means both Harry and Voldemort will die.
CD raised these points to me:
1) Why would Voldemort try to kill his own Horcrux time after time again
2) Why would he make somebody who's such a danger to him a Horcrux?
I replied:
1) I have two explanations. The first is that Voldemort doesn't know that he made Harry a horcrux, and the second is, if he did know, he has so much of his soul spread about anyway it wouldn't matter because he could create another with HARRY'S body.
2) Number two, Voldemort made Harry a horcrux unintentionally. It clearly states in the book that Voldemort was going to kill Harry, then get something from Gryffindor to encase his soul in, with Harry's death. Instead, he encased his soul in HARRY with Harry's parent's deaths, which, again, would explain the blood thing.
It also had a big implication when Dumbledore said 'or who' on the horcrux issue. It would also explain where Harry got his Parsletongue capabilities and looked like Voldemort, etc.
(Oh, and I think Snape is good. I think it was arranged, because Snape was supposed to keep in favour with the Death Eaters, for Snape to kill Dumbledore if he had to. Also, I think that he also killed Dumbledore because he had taken the Unbreakable Vow, and Draco couldn't complete his mission, which was to kill Dumbledore, so Snape had to do it for him. -nods-)
I'm still re-reading and haven't got to that part yet, could you clarify what page/chapter it's in?
*cough*because it didn't*cough*
Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:11 am
Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:36 am
the_dog_god wrote:Pg 473
"He seems to have reserved the process of making Horcruxes for particularily significant deaths. You would certainly have been that. He believed that in killing you, he was destroying the danger the prophecy had outlined. He believed he was making himself invincible. I am sure that he was intending to make his final Horcrux with your death."
However it then goes on to say
"As we know, he failed. After an interval of some years, however, he used Nagini to kill an old Muggle man, and it might then occured to him to turn her into his last Horcrux."
Anubis wrote:It clearly states in the book that Voldemort was going to kill Harry, then get something from Gryffindor to encase his soul in, with Harry's death. Instead, he encased his soul in HARRY with Harry's parent's deaths, which, again, would explain the blood thing.
Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:06 am
Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:19 am
Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:09 am
Shoyru_Lover wrote:Hmm, sorry if I've rehashed something... but you guys know how avadakedavra doesn't work unless you mean it right? Maybe... Snape didn't really kill Dumbledore... and it was all an act... and in the process... etc. etc. etc.
Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:42 pm
Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:07 pm
Qanda wrote:Shoyru_Lover wrote:Hmm, sorry if I've rehashed something... but you guys know how avadakedavra doesn't work unless you mean it right? Maybe... Snape didn't really kill Dumbledore... and it was all an act... and in the process... etc. etc. etc.
Snape looked at Dumbledore with burning hatred before killing him. Not meaning it, eh?
Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:12 pm
Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:29 pm
Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:08 pm
SpiraLethe wrote:Snape definitly killed Dumbledore. I'm not sure if he really "wanted" to, but he did. But who knows. I think most people have grately underestimated the complexity of the character known as Snape. I know I did. I did think he was complex before, but never to this extent. Dumbledore's death definitly serves some sort of great purpose. I have to admit, although I cried my eyes out, it does move the story to a whole new level. No one else's death, short of Harry's, would have done it.
And I highly doubt Dumbledore would make a horcrux.
By the way, the zombies should've gotten more "page" time! Shaun of the Dead with wizards would have rocked.
And man these books are getting dark! By the time they get to the 7th movie, it might have to be R rated. Sheesh.
Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:11 pm
My dad brought up a point... Dumbledore trusted Snape with everything he had... what if Dumbledore made Snape a horcrux? (<- NOT MY THEORY, but I think it's cute my dad is trying to get in on the theories)
I am not going to answer about the role in the next books, which probably gives you a big clue
Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:19 pm
.:Compact Disk:. wrote:Anubis wrote:It clearly states in the book that Voldemort was going to kill Harry, then get something from Gryffindor to encase his soul in, with Harry's death. Instead, he encased his soul in HARRY with Harry's parent's deaths, which, again, would explain the blood thing.
It does not clearly state that he incased any part of his soul in harry.
Sat Jul 23, 2005 8:50 pm
Anubis wrote:.:Compact Disk:. wrote:Anubis wrote:It clearly states in the book that Voldemort was going to kill Harry, then get something from Gryffindor to encase his soul in, with Harry's death. Instead, he encased his soul in HARRY with Harry's parent's deaths, which, again, would explain the blood thing.
It does not clearly state that he incased any part of his soul in harry.
I know it does not clearly state he incased any part of his soul in Harry. That is why it's called a theory. I said it clearly stated that 'Voldemort was going to kill Harry, then get something from Gryffindor to encase his soul in, with Harry's death'. NOT that he incased any part of his soul in Harry.