Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:36 am
vkceankraz wrote:I thought she wasn't even planning on starting Book 7 until the end of this year?
Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:44 am
Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:07 pm
Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:26 pm
.:Compact Disk:. wrote:Stop trying to say Dumbledores still alive. Just accept it for god's sake.
It's really getting on my nerves that people just won't give it up.
Just like Sirius is he's dead. Jo isn't bringing him back. End. Of. Discussion.
Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:35 pm
matchbow wrote:But fawkes can die many times. if he just reborns himself, Dumbledore could do some crazy magic and make a different kind of horcrux, with fawkes as the sacrifice. He probably can do stuff that we don't know about. Like making a special type of horcrux.
Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:02 am
Moogum wrote:.:Compact Disk:. wrote:Stop trying to say Dumbledores still alive. Just accept it for god's sake.
It's really getting on my nerves that people just won't give it up.
Just like Sirius is he's dead. Jo isn't bringing him back. End. Of. Discussion.
You're talking about a book where a person can split up his soul and place it in inanimate objects so that he can remain living even when his body is destroyed.
And you're telling us to quit theorizing about how other characters might be able to come back from the dead?
There's so much stuff in these books that is never what it appears to be. How about you stop claiming what JK is going to do and let people discuss what they want about who they want?
SpiraLethe wrote:The entire point if a horcrux is that you commit a horrible sin to gain something selfish. Besides, Dumbledore knows when his time is up and would accept it. And what does Fawkes' abilities have to do with anything? Dumbledore is a wizard, not a phoenix.
Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:16 am
.:Compact Disk:. wrote:Moogum wrote:.:Compact Disk:. wrote:Stop trying to say Dumbledores still alive. Just accept it for god's sake.
It's really getting on my nerves that people just won't give it up.
Just like Sirius is he's dead. Jo isn't bringing him back. End. Of. Discussion.
You're talking about a book where a person can split up his soul and place it in inanimate objects so that he can remain living even when his body is destroyed.
And you're telling us to quit theorizing about how other characters might be able to come back from the dead?
There's so much stuff in these books that is never what it appears to be. How about you stop claiming what JK is going to do and let people discuss what they want about who they want?
I now want you to read what Spira said on the subject.SpiraLethe wrote:The entire point if a horcrux is that you commit a horrible sin to gain something selfish. Besides, Dumbledore knows when his time is up and would accept it. And what does Fawkes' abilities have to do with anything? Dumbledore is a wizard, not a phoenix.
I rest my case.
Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:16 pm
o_0 wrote:A kill is a kill, whether it's for good or bad.
But I'm not defending that Dumbledore has a Horcrux. Because I don't even think he does. But you never know what JKR is going to do.
I just remembered. Fawkes is immune to Avada Kedavra and basilisks. :-/ Another reason that if Dumbledore had a Horcrux for it to be Fawkes.
I'm saying IF. I'm not saying that Fawkes is Dumbledore's Horcrux that he made 60-some years ago when he killed Grindelwald.
Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:04 pm
Moogum wrote:People are free to believe whatever they want until they are proven wrong by the books.
Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:44 pm
Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:50 pm
Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:40 am
Josephine wrote:And in Book 5 Sirius says "I doubt Regalus was so important for Voldemort to kill him personally." (along those lines) - but he was still killed. And probably by Voldie. And he was killed because he hid the locket.
Sapphire Faerie wrote:And Harry/Ginny. If he lives past book 7, they'll marry. Xandra shall be happy. I'm not worried about it though, I'm still thinking/hoping he'll die in the end.
(*Dranzer*) wrote:Now... to find a name for the Tonks/Lupin shipping..... Metawolf?
JKR Interview wrote:JKR: Do you have a theory? [about R.A.B.]
MA: We've come up with Regulus Black.
JKR: Have you now?
MA: Uh-oh.
[Laughter.]
JKR: Well, I think that would be, um, a fine guess.
Interview again wrote:MA [replying to JKR talking about Harry's grandparents]: That sort of shuts down Heir of Gryffindor [theories], as well.
JKR: [Pause.] Yeah. Well - yeah.
Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:25 am
Xela of Xandra wrote:I don't really want to know, actually. Spoilers are bad. (Shush, Chass. I've completely repented, spoiler-wise. I realized that it was rather boring, knowing huge secrets before-hand. Well. Not huge, really. More like, "Will we see the giant Invisible Mechasaur-Barbie frolicking on the island again?")
Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:06 am
ES: What's one question you wished to be asked and what would be the answer to that question?
JKR: Um — [long pause] — such a good question. What do I wish I could be asked? [Pause.] Today, just today, July the 16th, I was really hoping someone would ask me about R.A.B., and you did it. Just today, because I think that is — well, I hoped that people would.