Hunter Lupe wrote:
FlareEyes wrote:
Frames are anti-professional, anti-SEO and anti-W3 standards. Definitely not an option for any remotely serious web designer.
I though they were part of W3C standards?
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/present/frames.html
Yes it is present in the standards, otherwise the fox wouldn't support them, but you have to understand that HTML was designed to be a flexible language which could be used in many environments. Frames are oriented towards more static pages, such as documentations, e-books or what else have you. Internet-wise, it just fails to be effective when used normally on page. That's why includes were created, because it dinanically generates the content, in a way that the page exists as a whole, not two or more pages artificially joined.
I'm not saying you can't use frames, it's just not professional or SEO friendly.