Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:38 am
Scott, is it not 13 votes required for execution? 
Because it was 12 when 23 were logged aswell.
Because it was 12 when 23 were logged aswell.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 9:42 am
It is half of the votes required, so if there were 23 votes logged, then you would have to round up since we can't split our votes up, so 12 is still considered half for 23 and 24 in this case.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:14 pm
Qanda wrote:Dawn2 wrote:*shrug* I would quote my PM from Scottnak, but somehow I think that wouldn't be allowed.
Though, please tell me if it is, ScottNak, and I'll gladly do it.
No, I'm not fighting the fact I've been voted for, but I would like to clear my name.
But maybe you could explain why you voted for hyper in the first place, instead of just "offering" to quote your PM.
I voted for hyper because it seemed to me she was the most suspicious. Yes, It's likely I could be wrong.
HOWEVER- I will be changing my vote. Someone isn't being as active as the rest of us, and I think maybe it might be because they're hiding their identity. I know the person I'm voting for will not be the majority this time, but I think they may be a wolf more that hyper, so- hence the change of vote.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:36 pm
Well, who is that Dawn? I know we don't have a lot to go on at this point. But, Puck just seems more suspicious to me than hyperflutterby
Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:38 pm
Check my original voting post, Neopetsmom.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:46 pm
Uhm... seems that we split the votes -nearly- equally... so Dawn if you change your vote we could avoid an execution...
I know this will sound awfully suspicious, but everything can sound suspicious in thing game, so once again: we need an execution. Last time things started going well after we managed to do a couple of executions (mine included - ouch!) so... well, I think you got my point: I don't think we're likely to get a wolf/mafia the first time, but it will be someone off the suspects list.
Useless note: did you notice that nearly everyone talks about wolves and not mafia? Weird... I think it's before we're more used to that.
I know this will sound awfully suspicious, but everything can sound suspicious in thing game, so once again: we need an execution. Last time things started going well after we managed to do a couple of executions (mine included - ouch!) so... well, I think you got my point: I don't think we're likely to get a wolf/mafia the first time, but it will be someone off the suspects list.
Useless note: did you notice that nearly everyone talks about wolves and not mafia? Weird... I think it's before we're more used to that.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:59 pm
Wind wrote:Uhm... seems that we split the votes -nearly- equally... so Dawn if you change your vote we could avoid an execution...
I know this will sound awfully suspicious, but everything can sound suspicious in thing game, so once again: we need an execution.
Ehh... that does make sense.
So sorry, hyperflutterby, but we need an execution. *changes vote... again*
Sat Oct 16, 2004 3:10 pm
Wind, I think most of us played in the last one and we're more used to talking about wolves.
Scott, I love the little pink poogle shaped head thing sign for the mafia
Scott, I love the little pink poogle shaped head thing sign for the mafia
Sat Oct 16, 2004 3:20 pm
Dawn2 wrote:Check my original voting post, Neopetsmom.
Oh my... please do not edit your old posts for voting. If you must make a change in votes, do it on another post. Make things easier for me please.
like this...
Unvote: ScottNak
Vote: MysteryMan
I need to leave for comm service, but I will check back later....
Sat Oct 16, 2004 3:32 pm
Oh, I thought you mean to use that format by editing your original post and using the format that way.
So, it's Hyperflutterby.
My original post wrote:Unvote: hyperflutterby
New vote: White Wolf
EDIT:
Unvote: White Wolf
New vote: Hyperflutterby
So, it's Hyperflutterby.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:13 pm
Dawn2 wrote:HOWEVER- I will be changing my vote. Someone isn't being as active as the rest of us, and I think maybe it might be because they're hiding their identity. I know the person I'm voting for will not be the majority this time, but I think they may be a wolf more that hyper, so- hence the change of vote.
A lot of people aren't being active because at this point in the game we don't really have a lot to talk about. The first execution is tonight so after tonight everyone will be able to make better guesses at who's who.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:48 pm
Lass wrote:Dawn2 wrote:HOWEVER- I will be changing my vote. Someone isn't being as active as the rest of us, and I think maybe it might be because they're hiding their identity. I know the person I'm voting for will not be the majority this time, but I think they may be a wolf more that hyper, so- hence the change of vote.
A lot of people aren't being active because at this point in the game we don't really have a lot to talk about. The first execution is tonight so after tonight everyone will be able to make better guesses at who's who.
I haven't been very active due to my back side. But I will be active once the first execution is over.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:03 pm
ScottNak wrote:Dawn2 wrote:Check my original voting post, Neopetsmom.
Oh my... please do not edit your old posts for voting. If you must make a change in votes, do it on another post. Make things easier for me please.
like this...
Unvote: ScottNak
Vote: MysteryMan
I need to leave for comm service, but I will check back later....
Could it also be useful to go back to the original and unbold your original vote so we don't have to go back and forth to chack which ones have been changed? (I'm on dial-up, so it could take a lot of time checking, sorry)
Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:47 pm
No. Never EVER edit your old votes. It will make things very confusing to me. In fact, Dawn2, your inital post showed an Unvote before i even saw your initial vote which sorta confused me... But no worries, this is a new system, just got to get things working
I make you put the "Unvote: Person A So that I am aware that you are changing your vote from person A to person B (Vote: Person B).
It makes it MUCH MUCH easier for me to keep track of the votes.
And in fact... i accidentally put your vote as hyperflutterby already... so the only thing changing is the ordering of votes.
<hr>Shadowfare: 50% is required for execution, with 24 people, 12 votes are required.
jelly: Thanks for the compliment
<hr>
12:45 Execution Day Vote Update
I make you put the "Unvote: Person A So that I am aware that you are changing your vote from person A to person B (Vote: Person B).
It makes it MUCH MUCH easier for me to keep track of the votes.
And in fact... i accidentally put your vote as hyperflutterby already... so the only thing changing is the ordering of votes.
<hr>Shadowfare: 50% is required for execution, with 24 people, 12 votes are required.
jelly: Thanks for the compliment
<hr>
12:45 Execution Day Vote Update
hyperflutterby- 12 votes: wind, Matt, Starchaser, Kugetsu, twizzler0171, DracolordII, Lass, AutumnElf, okamotosan18, o_0, puck102701, dawn2
Puck102701- 10 votes: White_wolf, Ammer, Raze, Shadowfare, jellyoflight, warxelo, hyperflutterby, neopetsmom, alex, yesitish
White_wolf- 1 vote: ArticFox
Dawn2- 1 vote: Qanda
24 votes logged.
12 votes required for execution.
Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:28 pm
Could there be a double execution if the votes were spilt between only two people, and equally? I don't remember reading anything about it, so I was wondering if two people could be executed at the same time, or does that not make sense? Oh, and thank you for clearing up the voting. So no editing, so that the logged votes stay accurate, makes a lot of sense