I have to say that you have reached a ridiculous situation. You have absoultely no evidence whatsoever for o_0 being good or bad. Becuase of my limericks last game, people would know that posting like that would get you executed, so I do not have any idea why, if he was bad, Mark would have the mentality to be an absolute idiot and get himself voted of like that.
My personal suspect... Wind. Wind has played in many WW games before, both here, and on IDB, and it is this fact that leads me to think that she knows what makes the difference between a typical baddy role and a goodie role. Why else would she vote for someone who wrote a substantial amount of text so quickly, without really trying to back it up with evidence, just plainly stating that she was voting for Xil, with not even a quote to back it up.
My other suspect is sirclucky. Though I can't access IDB, I always feel that he is one of the people that campaigns for a first-day execution, yet today, he merely bandwagoned on the choice that it would be beneficial not to have an execution. Even if that isn't his view, he is a fairly distinctive player, normally, and I feel that this round, he is trying frantically to fall under the radar, whatever the reason. His reasoning was purely "going with everyone else", an excudse typically used just to seem rather average.
Just my two cents