For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:35 pm

Ixistant wrote:Actually, I thought there were 2 tribes of werewolves. I'm thinking of another game. You can actually get youre dreamer to check. I'm not a werewolf or a vampire. And if requested I will post my role. But I still think you're evil.

"Your dreamer"? You mean we are on different sides? Another nice slip there, Ixistant. It seems as if you regard yourself as an opposing team of the innocents.

Everyone thinks I am evil, and nothing I say can change it. Everyone, vote me if you like, but do double vote for Ixistant, who has made two blatant slips indicating evilness already.

(And in case you all think those could just have been careless mistakes, how often would you think of the dreamer in terms of "your dreamer", if you are on the side of the innocents? Only a baddie would think of the dreamer in that manner, mistake or not.)

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:43 pm

Qanda wrote:
Ixistant wrote:Actually, I thought there were 2 tribes of werewolves. I'm thinking of another game. You can actually get youre dreamer to check. I'm not a werewolf or a vampire. And if requested I will post my role. But I still think you're evil.

"Your dreamer"? You mean we are on different sides? Another nice slip there, Ixistant. It seems as if you regard yourself as an opposing team of the innocents.

Everyone thinks I am evil, and nothing I say can change it. Everyone, vote me if you like, but do double vote for Ixistant, who has made two blatant slips indicating evilness already.

(And in case you all think those could just have been careless mistakes, how often would you think of the dreamer in terms of "your dreamer", if you are on the side of the innocents? Only a baddie would think of the dreamer in that manner, mistake or not.)


Well, what was I supposed to write? A dreamer? The dreamer? your dremaer seemed like the best option at the time. And I find it funny that you're scrutinizing over my every post to find my faults in launguage and use them to make me your scapegoat.

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:45 pm

Same reason as before.

vote: Qanda

Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:47 pm

I wasn't finished yet, Ixistant.

More evidence!
Ixistant wrote: I'm not a werewolf or a vampire.

The natural instinct for an innocent defending himself would be to say "I am not a baddie." One who says "I am not this baddie or that baddie" usually is subconsciously implying that he is another type of baddie not stated. This is also due to a subconscious aversion to lying outrightly.

As as we all know, there is a stabbing cum framing person in this game, and I doubt that is just an extended power of the vampire or werewolf tribes. And as we all know, Ixistant was the very first one to vote for me after I was framed, glibly saying "And Qanda, I do usually get suspicious when the MC of the game says you killed an innocent with a dagger."

Thus I highly believe that Ixistant is bad, and probably is the stabber.

And Ixistant, people have been executed over lesser linguistical faults. You have made 3 slips, and that is more than enough for me to suspect you.

Duckey, it makes me suspicious that you vote for me without even commenting on the evidence I have placed forward regarding to Ixistant.

Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:05 pm

Qanda wrote:I wasn't finished yet, Ixistant.

More evidence!
Ixistant wrote: I'm not a werewolf or a vampire.

The natural instinct for an innocent defending himself would be to say "I am not a baddie." One who says "I am not this baddie or that baddie" usually is subconsciously implying that he is another type of baddie not stated. This is also due to a subconscious aversion to lying outrightly.

As as we all know, there is a stabbing cum framing person in this game, and I doubt that is just an extended power of the vampire or werewolf tribes. And as we all know, Ixistant was the very first one to vote for me after I was framed, glibly saying "And Qanda, I do usually get suspicious when the MC of the game says you killed an innocent with a dagger."

Thus I highly believe that Ixistant is bad, and probably is the stabber.

And Ixistant, people have been executed over lesser linguistical faults. You have made 3 slips, and that is more than enough for me to suspect you.

Duckey, it makes me suspicious that you vote for me without even commenting on the evidence I have placed forward regarding to Ixistant.


Well, if you must know my role, I'm the fairground hypnotist. I can hypnotise 1 person every odd night tinto telling me if they're good or evil. On Day 1 I actually cleared someone but I diddn't want to go "LIEK OMG!!! *not saying to protect them* IS GOODEST!!!" as that would jeprodise me and the person but now I can tell you all. I'll pm the person and ask them if it's OK for me to post who they are. I would have done it again yesterday but Qanda seems to have made TDG skip night. And I can protect myself once from execution by hypnotising the executioner to not shoot me, but instead shoot a warning shot. So there you go. My role. So could a protector please lend their aid? Thanks. And I also find it cute that you seem to have switcvhed suspicions again. First it was Twiz, then me, now duckey. Could you make up your mind please?

Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:09 pm

Ixistant wrote:And I also find it cute that you seem to have switcvhed suspicions again. First it was Twiz, then me, now duckey. Could you make up your mind please?

Twizzler is slightly suspicious, Duckey is even less so (he probably didn't bother to read what was posted), but you are the most suspicious one in my eyes.

I wonder how long it took you to come up with that role... :roll:

But since you can hypnotise the executioner into firing a warning shot, I suggest everyone vote for you just to prove your innocence. Though that could be a baddie power too, come to think of it.

Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:30 pm

Qanda wrote:
Ixistant wrote:And I also find it cute that you seem to have switcvhed suspicions again. First it was Twiz, then me, now duckey. Could you make up your mind please?

Twizzler is slightly suspicious, Duckey is even less so (he probably didn't bother to read what was posted), but you are the most suspicious one in my eyes.

I wonder how long it took you to come up with that role... :roll:

But since you can hypnotise the executioner into firing a warning shot, I suggest everyone vote for you just to prove your innocence. Though that could be a baddie power too, come to think of it.


Well, if that is what the majority thinks is right, but I think that it shall be a wasted vote.

Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:26 pm

What a busy day. Just to let you know I would certainly try to defend myself if accused guilty or not. *sticks hand in cookie jar* yumm... *Get's choclate all over face* I don't know who took the last cookie :evil:

Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:44 pm

Vote Tally - Day Four

Qanda = 4 = Dargonz, Chipper, Ixistant, Duckey
Ixistant = 2 = Qanda, Twizzler0171

Twizzler0171 must vote for Ixistant today. She cannot use her second vote.

--------------------------------------------------------

No execution = 0

16 remain
9 majority
12 lock

Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:52 pm

Oookay... If I must, I must. After all, You're my hero the_dog_god. o.o'

Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:21 pm

Wow, all this bickering.

Qanda, I'm really having trouble believing you due to the cape shield. Vampires in novels, movies, illustrations, etc... always have capes and one would assume a shield given to a Vampire would be a cape.

Vote: Qanda

This may change. I just need more evidence than you blaming others for various incidents.

Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:49 pm

Well that was certainly eventful. Though Ixistant did make a few slip ups (which obviously can't be ignored), they were fairly minor ones and wouldn't justify a vote against him. Not to mention the detail given in the role he described.
Qanda you do seem a little desperate in your posts, maybe that's just me though. However, your defence is a good one and I'm inclined to believe you at this point in time. (I've always been really gullable!)

Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:55 pm

Hmm. Well I think you both have good points! :P

VOTE: Qanda
VOTE: Ixistant


You have both found quite a few things which suggest the other is evil.. hmm.
And Ixistant, though you did reveal a role... you could have made it up... or you could have based a bit of it on your real role... or of course you could be telling the truth! :P I don't know... if more evidence appears I will unvote either one of you.

Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:51 pm

Hm, actually... I'm kind of relieved that 'I must vote for Ixistant'... that means no one can yell at me. xD Hehe. Who knows? You're my hero the_dog_god... :P

Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:37 am

Attention : Due to o_0 breaching a critical rule, he has been dropped from this game indefinately. If the Vampires win, he shall not win with them. He can no longer be revived, nor can he post in groupies.

Additionally, the secret in question that o_0 revealed is no longer correct. I will not reveal anymore than this

I urge all live people to read the rules thouroughly. Dead players should read them as well. I do not want to have to take such measures again.


Vote Tally - Day Four

Qanda = 6 = Dargonz, Chipper, Ixistant, Duckey, Ammer, Maniac
Ixistant = 3 = Qanda, Twizzler0171, Maniac

Twizzler0171 must vote for Ixistant today. She cannot use her second vote.

--------------------------------------------------------

No execution = 0

16 remain
9 majority
12 lock
Last edited by TDG on Tue Mar 22, 2005 5:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Topic locked