Mon May 16, 2005 8:06 pm
I'll have to find someone else to vote for. I think those angelic emoticons mean he'll be protected somehow.
Mon May 16, 2005 8:50 pm
Twizzler0171 wrote:Whee, I have a question! ^.^
Applehat said he told you his role, CW. I don't know what time he did it, it might have been, before or after execution time (if it was before... I notice you didn't unvote. O_o In which case, I would ask: Why didn't you?). But, either way... why are you denying this? Applehat has no reason to lie...
Bah, I'm so confused...
...That is a damn good question.
Holding off my vote until I hear the answer
Mon May 16, 2005 9:35 pm
I can't believe I missed the first execution! I'm so behind, sorry I haven't been on. The problem is I'm still in a rush, so I'm just going to vote: CWisgood for now, and hope for an execution because we definately need one.
Mon May 16, 2005 9:36 pm
you see i was on to something voting on cw and stuff. And i shall vote again...Vote:Cwisgood
Mon May 16, 2005 9:41 pm
Im going to vote for Vote: CWisgood only to get a majority, but this probably will change.
Mon May 16, 2005 10:48 pm
I considered Twizzler's post since I was thinking along the same longs. I'll vote after your reply CW.
Mon May 16, 2005 11:59 pm
I read through the thread, and CW's post with all the smilies really stood out at me. He seems suspicous, but if he gives a resonable defence, I'll remove this vote.
Vote: CWisgood
Vote: CWisgood
Tue May 17, 2005 12:03 am
Vote: CWisgood
Just to reach majority, though I'm not sure if we'll be able to get him.
Just to reach majority, though I'm not sure if we'll be able to get him.
Tue May 17, 2005 2:56 am
I dunno about CW. Posting requirements aren't always bad, and CW was..isn'the always suspicious but good?
*blames CW on his name*
I'd vote if he could...something.
*blames CW on his name*
I'd vote if he could...something.
Tue May 17, 2005 3:53 am
Okay, I admit the smilies are posting requirements. What's the big deal? Not all posting requirements are evil.
To Twizzler0171: I didn't lie. The Applehat did. I repeat, he lied. Why would someone even tell a random person who he doesn't know well his role, if it's a powerful one that helps innocents? He might be bad. Some roles allow you to select GOOD or EVIL. He may be one of these. Or converted.
To Twizzler0171: I didn't lie. The Applehat did. I repeat, he lied. Why would someone even tell a random person who he doesn't know well his role, if it's a powerful one that helps innocents? He might be bad. Some roles allow you to select GOOD or EVIL. He may be one of these. Or converted.
Tue May 17, 2005 3:56 am
CWisgood wrote:To Twizzler0171: I didn't lie. The Applehat did. I repeat, he lied. Why would someone even tell a random person who he doesn't know well his role, if it's a powerful one that helps innocents? He might be bad. Some roles allow you to select GOOD or EVIL. He may be one of these. Or converted.
Or, he might be a dead innocent... *Nod*
Tue May 17, 2005 3:58 am
Would you tell someone you have absolutely no idea what his role is if you're a powerful innocent? The Applehat is lying...
Tue May 17, 2005 4:00 am
*cough i would cough*
And that isn't really helping your defence at all cw.
And that isn't really helping your defence at all cw.
Tue May 17, 2005 4:02 am
CWisgood wrote:Would you tell someone you have absolutely no idea what his role is if you're a powerful innocent? The Applehat is lying...
I would...and now we're friends ... yay!
And for some reason, you seem to be trying to point the finger elsewhere
Vote: CWisgood
You really haven't made that good of a defense as in what would be the motive behind the Applehat's lying after death...
Last edited by Syrill on Tue May 17, 2005 4:04 am, edited 2 times in total.
Tue May 17, 2005 4:02 am
That wouldn't help the innocents at all... it's your choice. 