Tue May 17, 2005 9:48 pm
*shrug* I'm not going to bother defending myself, because a) I know I'm good, and b) I have to run out to get my bus in like 2 minutes 
Tue May 17, 2005 10:11 pm
But Alex is my friend [Yes...at this rate I'll save all my friends even if they kill me...]
Tue May 17, 2005 10:13 pm
Okay, this is the story.. A dreamer contacted me and said s/he knew I'm good (because of dreaming). S/he then told me that Sirc was evil ans s/he knew it because s/he used a SP that can dream if people was good or evil.
o_0: The Dreamer did it because s/he wanted to make sure sirclucky is good. He isn't.
sirc: Good job on getting yourself more suspiscious. Now I'm 99% sure you're a baddie. You obviously want the dreamer to clear that so your team could kill him/her. And there are Good or Evil Dreamers. I was one in Shrek.
Matt: I'll choose option 3.
3. CWisGood accuses Sirclucky. Majority votes Sirc. Sirc dies and turns out to be a baddie. I continue to live out my name as a hero.
DiscordantNote: The
smilies did mean spomething.
Monique: I stopped the attack by sirc. Using my role power, I locked Sirc's door in an attempt to protect him, but instead prevented him from doing evil. The lack of deaths is the best evidence.
o_0: The Dreamer did it because s/he wanted to make sure sirclucky is good. He isn't.
sirc: Good job on getting yourself more suspiscious. Now I'm 99% sure you're a baddie. You obviously want the dreamer to clear that so your team could kill him/her. And there are Good or Evil Dreamers. I was one in Shrek.
Matt: I'll choose option 3.
3. CWisGood accuses Sirclucky. Majority votes Sirc. Sirc dies and turns out to be a baddie. I continue to live out my name as a hero.
DiscordantNote: The
smilies did mean spomething.
Monique: I stopped the attack by sirc. Using my role power, I locked Sirc's door in an attempt to protect him, but instead prevented him from doing evil. The lack of deaths is the best evidence.
Tue May 17, 2005 10:26 pm
Alright we are all aware that good people send in lists too, but they could both still be bad. Alright I'm new to this side okay, but frankly the point of the game is to kill the baddies, so why do none of you think that this is significant? Blah I don't know anymore, can someone at least look into o_0 and Alex, like a dreamer, because I don't want to kill someone iwth a good role either, but something has to be done.
Tue May 17, 2005 11:41 pm
Vote: Sirclucky
CWisgood's last post (the bit about the locked door) sounded convincing enough.
CWisgood's last post (the bit about the locked door) sounded convincing enough.
Tue May 17, 2005 11:44 pm
Vote: SirClucky
What CW said does make sense...
What CW said does make sense...
Tue May 17, 2005 11:54 pm
Assuming I WAS bad, would it have made sence for me to be the spokesperson on my team after contacting you and finiding out your role? No, because Id figgure youd lock me up. Now the lack of deaths isnt hard to explain. I protected discord last night. Baddies coulve easily made that their targeted - as well as the fact that they couldve targeted another protectors target.
Clearly CW or I is evil. Now whom may I ask had heaps more suspsion BEFORE he came out with his "information". If you kill me now and CW later you wind up killing your protector and then a baddie while the baddies themselves get a few free kills. Kill CW now and we kill and baddie, and then i'll prob be killed by some baddie team - but all in all it gets the same stuff accomplished in half the time.
Clearly CW or I is evil. Now whom may I ask had heaps more suspsion BEFORE he came out with his "information". If you kill me now and CW later you wind up killing your protector and then a baddie while the baddies themselves get a few free kills. Kill CW now and we kill and baddie, and then i'll prob be killed by some baddie team - but all in all it gets the same stuff accomplished in half the time.
Wed May 18, 2005 12:01 am
sirclucky wrote:Assuming I WAS bad, would it have made sence for me to be the spokesperson on my team after contacting you and finiding out your role? No, because Id figgure youd lock me up. Now the lack of deaths isnt hard to explain. I protected discord last night. Baddies coulve easily made that their targeted - as well as the fact that they couldve targeted another protectors target.
As flattering as that is, you couldn't have protected me. From what I gathered from past WW games (that I read), if a killing was prevented by a protection spell, it would usually be mentioned that something else, like a trail of blood, that appeared that same night. This is because the protector (most of the time, anyway) will harm whoever tried to kill the protectee. There was no evidence that this happened, therefore you are a liar.
Wed May 18, 2005 12:03 am
DiscordantNote wrote:sirclucky wrote:Assuming I WAS bad, would it have made sence for me to be the spokesperson on my team after contacting you and finiding out your role? No, because Id figgure youd lock me up. Now the lack of deaths isnt hard to explain. I protected discord last night. Baddies coulve easily made that their targeted - as well as the fact that they couldve targeted another protectors target.
As flattering as that is, you couldn't have protected me. From what I gathered from past WW games (that I read), if a killing was prevented by a protection spell, it would usually be mentioned that something else, like a trail of blood, that appeared that same night. This is because the protector (most of the time, anyway) will harm whoever tried to kill the protectee. There was no evidence that this happened, therefore you are a liar.
Well, it depends. Usually when a trail of blood or something appears, it's someone like the selfish healer (who stays alive the first time they're "killed"). Some hosts don't show a sign of protection.
Wed May 18, 2005 12:05 am
either I dont read plots fully enough - or ive never seen that. In all games that I recall, when a protector protects sucesfully thers no signs in the night scene. I dont see why your expecting Qanda to be any differnt. Theres nothing in my role sheet which states that there will be signs that there was a sucesfull protection.
Wed May 18, 2005 12:06 am
I am more suspicious of CWisgood than clucky (even though killing them both would be better, as we'd know if both are good/bad. XD
I don't get it: if there's daydreaming and dreaming for good/bad, couldn't CW just be talking about his teammate, and his team could be dreaming? Or am I missing some random detail?
Vote: CWisgood
Vote: sirclucky
I don't get it: if there's daydreaming and dreaming for good/bad, couldn't CW just be talking about his teammate, and his team could be dreaming? Or am I missing some random detail?
Vote: CWisgood
Vote: sirclucky
Wed May 18, 2005 12:12 am
Eh yesh, I think you only get to vote once. And are you saying that you think CW and I are both on the same team trying to kill eachother off... or did I totally misread your post 
Wed May 18, 2005 12:15 am
Oh, REALLY?
Ook.
Unvote: clucky
I guess I still have to do that in case.
And no, I didn't mean that.
Ook.
Unvote: clucky
I guess I still have to do that in case.
And no, I didn't mean that.
Wed May 18, 2005 1:10 am
sirclucky wrote:Eh yesh, I think you only get to vote once. And are you saying that you think CW and I are both on the same team trying to kill eachother off... or did I totally misread your post
I'm pretty sure he meant the dreamer was on his team.
Wed May 18, 2005 1:25 am
YesItIsh wrote:I am more suspicious of CWisgood than clucky (even though killing them both would be better, as we'd know if both are good/bad. XD
I don't get it: if there's daydreaming and dreaming for good/bad, couldn't CW just be talking about his teammate, and his team could be dreaming? Or am I missing some random detail?
Vote: CWisgood
Vote: sirclucky
The daydreaming is the dreaming of GOOD or EVIL.
I'm definitely talking about my teammate. In case you don't know, the Dreamer is considered an innocent (same team as me).
BTW, we still need 6 votes to execute sirc.