Sun Aug 28, 2005 1:49 am
Lol
Well, awaiting o_0's pm.
Well, awaiting o_0's pm.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:04 am
Okay, I just have a small speculation.
Dranzer was quoting a role power that Requiem said she had. I just made something up to PM to him to prove that anyone could write a fake role.
My thing was:
Now I realized something. We haven't been having any Death Eater attacks. Perhaps that's the reason that we haven't! The Death Eaters went into hiding until Voldemort rose back to power! O_O
EDIT: More proof that Requiem's lying.
Someone who I trust greatly told me that Ammer went over the roles with someone else for spelling/grammar errors.
EDITAGAIN: I'm not basing it JUST on grammatical errors, Monique. That's just another piece of "evidence." Had there been no grammatical errors, I still would have suspected Requiem due to "holes" in the role.
Dranzer was quoting a role power that Requiem said she had. I just made something up to PM to him to prove that anyone could write a fake role.
My thing was:
1. You do not have a physical form, as you are still weak from the night when you tried to kill the Potters. Before you can use any of your powers, you must find Peter Pettigrew. Each night, you can send me a list of four people BEFORE execution, and you will get the results AFTER night ends.
Now I realized something. We haven't been having any Death Eater attacks. Perhaps that's the reason that we haven't! The Death Eaters went into hiding until Voldemort rose back to power! O_O
EDIT: More proof that Requiem's lying.
Someone who I trust greatly told me that Ammer went over the roles with someone else for spelling/grammar errors.
EDITAGAIN: I'm not basing it JUST on grammatical errors, Monique.
That's just another piece of "evidence." Had there been no grammatical errors, I still would have suspected Requiem due to "holes" in the role.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:27 am
o_0 wrote:Now I realized something. We haven't been having any Death Eater attacks. Perhaps that's the reason that we haven't! The Death Eaters went into hiding until Voldemort rose back to power! O_O
There's a thought. Makes the whole everyone-dies premise kind of weird, but there's a thought.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:33 am
Well I am also going to vote for:
Vote: Bangel
Vote: Bangel
Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:37 am
Vote: Req
Mark seems to have some good evidence on her.
Mark seems to have some good evidence on her.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:42 am
Kidwaiy and CD, I'm not sure if those votes will count. Though the execution is late, the votes were still due by 6:00 NST. Or, at least that's the rule for most Werewolf games.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:08 am
Oh... Great...
*pout*
*pout*
Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:37 am
Tharkun (5 Votes) - .:Requiem:., DiscordantNote, fzun, matterbug, weewoman
.:Requiem:. (5 Votes) - o_0, Sock, weewoman, Tharkun, .:Compact Disk:.
Bangel (10 Votes) - o_0, watericesage, Pixa, .:Compact Disk:., matterbug, Robert, Breakthrough, Discordantnote, Sock, Mandy, Kidwaiy
20 votes
14 votes needed for first execution // 15 to lock
21 votes needed for second execution // 22 to lock
28 alive
---
Considering I came back very late, Day 5 will be extended to tomorrow. I am sorry for this but I don't want to do a bunch of scenes in one post where they should all be spread out in the first place. You may make changes to any list you have sent or what not. Thank you.
Also, about the roles -- the grammar more specifically. Monique and I revised them at about 5am in the morning so don't expect them to be picture perfect. I am very picky about grammar but at 5 in the morning, you just don't care anymore.
.:Requiem:. (5 Votes) - o_0, Sock, weewoman, Tharkun, .:Compact Disk:.
Bangel (10 Votes) - o_0, watericesage, Pixa, .:Compact Disk:., matterbug, Robert, Breakthrough, Discordantnote, Sock, Mandy, Kidwaiy
20 votes
14 votes needed for first execution // 15 to lock
21 votes needed for second execution // 22 to lock
28 alive
---
Considering I came back very late, Day 5 will be extended to tomorrow. I am sorry for this but I don't want to do a bunch of scenes in one post where they should all be spread out in the first place. You may make changes to any list you have sent or what not. Thank you.
Also, about the roles -- the grammar more specifically. Monique and I revised them at about 5am in the morning so don't expect them to be picture perfect. I am very picky about grammar but at 5 in the morning, you just don't care anymore.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:43 am
Like I said earlier, grammar wasn't the main reason I think Requiem's lying.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:44 am
o_0 wrote:Like I said earlier, grammar wasn't the main reason I think Requiem's lying.
I know, but it seemed to be a subject everyone seemed to be curious about.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:06 am
Dangit. A pox on all of you. Y'know what, fine. Kill me, have my role right out there in the open. You'll be regretting it in a big way when the baddies eat you alive, and man will you be looking stupid, o_0. Along with every other innocent who voted for me.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:11 am
.:Requiem:. wrote:You'll be regretting it in a big way when the baddies eat you alive, and man will you be looking stupid, o_0.
I really don't care about looking stupid. I always do.
Even if you're good, you still know way too much, and are a prime target for conversion. I think that a list of most of the good characters would be very good for bad teams.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:34 am
-shrug- Well...just. Yeah. I don't think I even care anymore.
EDIT: Syrill....'Quiemie'? Wehn did I become 'Quiemie'? XD Anyway, looks like I'll be joining you in commentary pretty soon.
EDIT: Syrill....'Quiemie'? Wehn did I become 'Quiemie'? XD Anyway, looks like I'll be joining you in commentary pretty soon.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:06 am
I am beginning to suspect CD, and I am not voting tonight (not that I know if I can, but anyway). I'm way too confused because I haven't seen any real, set-in-concrete evidence that Requiem's bad, or that Bangel is a death eater.
Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:38 pm
If Req was bad, how did she lead us to kill several evil players?