Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:31 pm
Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:32 pm
dolphinling wrote:So um. Did no one else notice that he was timed, and battles didn't matter?
Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:40 pm
Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:47 pm
Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:56 pm
Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:17 pm
Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:30 am
unr4veled wrote:But the times that it went per minute did fluctuate.... not too much, but i know that at one time it went up to 440 per minute, and at others it was as low as 300. So. it wasn't a standard so many per second. I don't think.
i hope.
why would they make him timed.... i mean..
Do they really like torturing us that much?
Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:25 am
dolphinling wrote:So um. Did no one else notice that he was timed, and battles didn't matter?
I'd have said something sooner, but I was profiting.
(and note that battles still might or might not give you points. no way to tell on that)
Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:39 am
Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:08 am
Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:15 am
AySz88 wrote:
Plus, I don't understand how people are leaping from "players' participation didn't matter in the timing of the mayor's defeat" and "we're not going to get prizes for fighting the mayor". On the contrary, they definitely kept track - see the numbers on the 1-player challengers list? I would be surprised if they didn't use this data.
Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:22 am
anjuna wrote:dolphinling wrote:So um. Did no one else notice that he was timed, and battles didn't matter?
I'd have said something sooner, but I was profiting.
(and note that battles still might or might not give you points. no way to tell on that)
I am so glad you said this. I just felt indeed so foolish for ruining my stats (and "I am not even a BDer") AND fighting in obvious futility that instead I made a nice 10k on healing potions.
![]()
Perhaps those so naive to think it mattered, should be penalized with less plot points?That would be so evil, but actually kind of more fair.
Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:26 am
AySz88 wrote:I strongly object to all this "I'm better than you because I didn't participate" business. In a cooperative game (element), the person who decides to not participate has no reason to feel better than those who do; as long as everyone has fun, who cares how they did it? And if anyone feels they gave up a piece of the plot to covet that stat, perhaps a bit of reevaluation is in order.
Plus, I don't understand how people are leaping from "players' participation didn't matter in the timing of the mayor's defeat" and "we're not going to get prizes for fighting the mayor". On the contrary, they definitely kept track - see the numbers on the 1-player challengers list? I would be surprised if they didn't use this data.
Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:30 am
Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:38 am