Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:55 pm
Results should be sent now. If you need results and didn't receive them, PM me. Also, from now on, please reply to any PM I send you. This lets me know that the PM actually went through. Thanks!
Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:15 pm
Vote: Malibu
Only thing to really go on at this point.
Only thing to really go on at this point.
Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:17 pm
h jy. Jst fnd t wht my rm dd lst nght.
nly tw psts t lst.
nly tw psts t lst.
Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:20 pm
Vote: malibu
Just to let everyone know, I'm leaving in about an hour and won't be back til sunday evening. So if you try to get into contact with me, I'm not ignoring you, I'm just not there. Be nice and don't kill me while I'm gone?
Just to let everyone know, I'm leaving in about an hour and won't be back til sunday evening. So if you try to get into contact with me, I'm not ignoring you, I'm just not there. Be nice and don't kill me while I'm gone?
Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:35 pm
Hmm? Gss thnlysnn ws tllng th trth. Grps s lckd
Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:51 pm
Boo-yah! Talk about that awesome round-house kick, eh? *poses*
Anyways. The fact that the thing that attacked me made its first appearance (at least, that's what I got out of the plot) rather worries me. It means that either the person has been either lying in wait, they have multiple powers, or they had a role that could only be activated by something happening. Meh, I dunno -- I'll worry about it later.
Vote: Malibu
I'm sorry, but it seems like the best thing to do right now. And from what you've said... it just seems rather weak and insubstantial. =/
Anyways. The fact that the thing that attacked me made its first appearance (at least, that's what I got out of the plot) rather worries me. It means that either the person has been either lying in wait, they have multiple powers, or they had a role that could only be activated by something happening. Meh, I dunno -- I'll worry about it later.
Vote: Malibu
I'm sorry, but it seems like the best thing to do right now. And from what you've said... it just seems rather weak and insubstantial. =/
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:03 pm
Vote: Malibu
I don't think we have anyone else to go on.
I don't think we have anyone else to go on.
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:11 pm
Vote: Malibu
No better choices.
No better choices.
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:25 pm
Didn't want to vote in my post requirement posts as it personally always annoys me when I MC when people use votes that are hard to read. Just makes it more logistically nightmarish.
VOTE: Malibu
(AKA: Mlb)
VOTE: Malibu
(AKA: Mlb)
Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:06 pm
Vote: Malibu He has no proof he's innocent, and I want an execution for once
Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:12 pm
Vote: Malibu
O.O@Twizz surviving again
Oh well... people seem to believe her.
Edit: What's with this new baddie? O.o Anyone got any ideas on that?
O.O@Twizz surviving again
Oh well... people seem to believe her.
Edit: What's with this new baddie? O.o Anyone got any ideas on that?
Last edited by .:Compact Disk:. on Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:15 pm
malibu is a girl.
And I have my role to prove I'm innocent. A role which I had posted when DM got resurrected to suggest that she was bad, but was told to take down by okamotosan18. Aside from about two people, no one who has voted for me has asked me what that role is, or has asked for any proof that I'm innocent, they're just taking the word of someone else.
So how can you say that there's no proof when you haven't asked for any? Taking the word of someone else over something I said when I was confused isn't exactly proof either. Especially not when the values that she's given about my shield were mostly guesses on her half - I never told her that my shield was at 25, she just posted it.
Aside from the fact that my shield wasn't 50 to start off with, so it being 25 wouldn't be a halving of what it was. In fact, if my shield was 25, it'd be at less than half of what it originally was, therefore blowing that theory out of the way.
You say I have no proof of my innocence - but where does Apex have any real proof of what my shield is at? That's half the basis of this argument is, isn't it?
Oh, and the other part - Apex saying that she got attacked after she accused me. The only way I could have done that was through an SP. I still have the SP I received just after night was posted. My role doesn't have any killing powers.
And I have my role to prove I'm innocent. A role which I had posted when DM got resurrected to suggest that she was bad, but was told to take down by okamotosan18. Aside from about two people, no one who has voted for me has asked me what that role is, or has asked for any proof that I'm innocent, they're just taking the word of someone else.
So how can you say that there's no proof when you haven't asked for any? Taking the word of someone else over something I said when I was confused isn't exactly proof either. Especially not when the values that she's given about my shield were mostly guesses on her half - I never told her that my shield was at 25, she just posted it.
Aside from the fact that my shield wasn't 50 to start off with, so it being 25 wouldn't be a halving of what it was. In fact, if my shield was 25, it'd be at less than half of what it originally was, therefore blowing that theory out of the way.
You say I have no proof of my innocence - but where does Apex have any real proof of what my shield is at? That's half the basis of this argument is, isn't it?
Oh, and the other part - Apex saying that she got attacked after she accused me. The only way I could have done that was through an SP. I still have the SP I received just after night was posted. My role doesn't have any killing powers.
Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:18 pm
Yeah, I found out what happened with your role, and that proved you were innocent at first. Taking DM's role when Typhoon said DM died innocent at first, would be proof you were innocent. You can't prove you haven't been converted though.
Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:27 pm
My role is completely and utterly useless for a baddie team. (Unfortunately, it's also appearing completely and utterly useless for the innocents, but that's not due to a lack of trying on my behalf.)
The shame in this case is that even if I vote right now for someone who has been suspicious for a few days, and actually is a bad guy, that I'll still get majority vote, because the baddie teams will have no qualms in voting off someone they know isn't on their side (every baddie wants to kill an extra innocent, if it's through execution, it's better for them, they look less suspicious).
The shame in this case is that even if I vote right now for someone who has been suspicious for a few days, and actually is a bad guy, that I'll still get majority vote, because the baddie teams will have no qualms in voting off someone they know isn't on their side (every baddie wants to kill an extra innocent, if it's through execution, it's better for them, they look less suspicious).
Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:39 pm
malibu wrote:My role is completely and utterly useless for a baddie team. (Unfortunately, it's also appearing completely and utterly useless for the innocents, but that's not due to a lack of trying on my behalf.)
The shame in this case is that even if I vote right now for someone who has been suspicious for a few days, and actually is a bad guy, that I'll still get majority vote, because the baddie teams will have no qualms in voting off someone they know isn't on their side (every baddie wants to kill an extra innocent, if it's through execution, it's better for them, they look less suspicious).
Unfortunately, most of the time the (smart) baddies don't know the role of the person they convert, as the people who's roles are publicly known are more of an obvious, "OMG! The baddies must have converted them because their role is useful!" type thing. *shrug* So, "My role isn't useful!" isn't a good excuse.