Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:01 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:20 am
Daze wrote:I, for one find TNT's position on this appalling. Ok, so it is only a game and what GUP is doing isn't a scam, but it is not playing the site in the spirit of the game.
TNT many times have said it would be nice to play in the spirit of the game, to play fair.
I can't see how turning zapped pets into green unis deliberately to stop others getting a nice painted pet, is playing within the spirit of the game.
TNT's insistence that it isn't any worse using pounded painted pets as a status symbol and then dumping them when another comes along is absurd - we are not talking about live pets, if TNT doesn't like how the pound is used, then it should be taken away or upgraded to something better.
I am not 'all twisted up' about this and it doesn't affect me, but I feel strongly about a group of people that have taken it on themselves to change the way Neopets is naturally run.
The very idea of GUP offends me - here is a group that for no other person is to spoil the game for others. It is mean spirited.
Also, this action is a group effort - TNT frowns on groups buying shop items (as in false inflation) but has nothing but laughter for this! So the situations are a little different, but this group is still en masse changing how the game is played.
Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:31 am
It's only against the rules if they buy them up as a group, only to sell them at higher prices. As long as they're using all of the ones they buy, then I don't think it's against the rules.
Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:41 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:57 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:28 am
kcharles wrote:Coolio!PM me!Penguin wrote:kcharles wrote:I call co-leader!Penguin wrote:I'll make the pet page for the Green Uni Zapping Project it might take a day or two but Im all for it and I was coming here to suggest it but sense there's obviously a support base we can combat these hooligans
Its a deal
Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:47 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:02 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:11 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:54 am
Officer 1BDI wrote:So, although I support their right to do it (after all, they're not breaking any rules), I certainly don't agree with it.
theonlysaneone wrote:I'm just sad because I missed the opportunity to profit from this. I checked the prices for GUMPs after the editorial was released, and they were at 10K. Now they're at 15K. I could have made an easy 100K off of this.
Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:58 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:05 am
Erin wrote:I agree with you Daze. People who collect rare pets and then dump them when something more "rare" comes along aren't hurting anyone else. The GUP people who deliberately ruin those pets ARE. So who is more at fault here? If these were living, breathing animals, then yes, I would feel a little differently. But they're not. The GUP group needs to take a collective chill pill and just play the game as it was meant to be played.
Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:15 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:21 am
Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:27 am
Troggy7 wrote:ninjausagi does have a point. Thats like how people will buy a poopload of the same item, then price them all and change all the prices. I know its not exactly the same, but isnt that against the rules?