For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:22 pm

Unvote: Ammer

Thanks for clearing things up really fast.

But I don't think you are saved from execution, as top two people are axed majority or not.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:08 am

Rox wrote:I'll answer that for you, Jasmine. No, I didn't. I'm not the biggest fan of Day 1 role-trading, and the only person who actually contacted me for a role-trade was pips.

Which he, conveniently, ignored. If you're an innocent and just don't want to trade, at least respond saying so. Flat out ignoring a request sets off big flashing red lights of "I'm a baddie and don't have a fake role prepared, so I'm going to ignore this and hope you forget about it."

Vote: Rox

As far as Ammer... I dunno. I think I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now, but I think the dreamer(s) should definitely check him out.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:12 am

Vote: Rox

Nothing personal... ;) just makes sense.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:29 am

Vote: Rox

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:43 am

unvote: no execution
Vote: Rox


Sorry, but the arguments are starting to make sense to me. However, regarding Rox surviving execution, I was told that he was given an extra heart on night 2 (because at the time, he seemed to be a source of info for the innocents) -- so the fact that he survived execution doesn't really substantiate that he's a baddie.

I'm holding off on Ammer, though it'd be nice to confirm his rez wasn't a conversion. (Although with no other leads, a non-vote is the same as a vote here.)

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:08 am

I've a question for you all...

Does anyone else find it strange that the dreamer didn't think to check out Rox after it was discovered he targeted May? I don't know if there are separate team dreamers or what, but I just don't understand why you wouldn't check up on the Rox thing to confirm.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:25 am

I've been wondering that as well malibu.
I know it has been asked/mentioned on the thread, yet so far no one has replied back to it.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:54 am

pipsqueeek wrote:If you're an innocent and just don't want to trade, at least respond saying so. Flat out ignoring a request sets off big flashing red lights of "I'm a baddie and don't have a fake role prepared, so I'm going to ignore this and hope you forget about it."


Exactly my thoughts, pipsqueeek. Thanks for that. My vote on Rox stands.

I guess Ammer's role sounds plausible...what he said about tracking Alex sounds kinda fishy, though. Come to think of it, if the dreamer contacted Alex after night 1 to report May, doesn't that mean Alex hasn't been dreamt...? If she's proved her role some other way, though, I suppose more suspicious people should be looked at first.

Edit: Malibu, from what's been said on the thread, it sounds like the dreamer was pretty certain that Rox was evil. Dreaming him the second night would have been a waste of a dream, in that case. If I'm wrong, please correct me - I might be misunderstanding something.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:12 am

Votes:

Rox (18): Laryxler, Wee, Anvil, Alex, Loser, Ethics, Bruces Galore, Byakuya San, Pickles, Ammer, Twinkle, WIS, Averly, Raz, Pipsqueeek, Pixa, Christopher, Siniri
Ammer (6): Malibu, Rox, Bruces Galore, Byakuya San, Twinkle, Laryxler
No Execution (3): Helena, Rox, Hansy

As of right now, Rox and Ammer will still be executed.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:14 am

Rox, shut up. It was NOT a tracker role, so stop whinging of "OH NOES I TARGETED AND THEN YOU AUTOMATICALLY ASSUME ATTACK".

Because I need to spell this out. The dreamer also has a chance of dreaming the alignment of the person who targets the person they originally dream of. So when May was dreamt of, they were able to dream of the alignment of Rox also. So, there was no point dreaming Rox on day 2, because we already knew.

I have proven my role to a few people, weee5067 :)

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:19 am

Alex is innocent. If she's not, Ryguy and Tanner are completely insane and I give up right now xD No one would fake that role.

Rox has a chance to be evil, he might be stalling for time or he might actually be innocent. I'd be willing to give him a chance, but it's too late to swing execution now, by the looks of it.

And Ammer's going to be executed with only six votes on her? How quaint.

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:31 am

This dreamer role seems a little strange, but I'm more willing to believe Alex's explanation.

Vote: Rox

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:36 am

Alex wrote:Because I need to spell this out. The dreamer also has a chance of dreaming the alignment of the person who targets the person they originally dream of. So when May was dreamt of, they were able to dream of the alignment of Rox also. So, there was no point dreaming Rox on day 2, because we already knew.


Thank you. I didn't actually see that posted coherently before, I thought it was just an assumption being made that Rox was evil and that there was no follow-up check. Looking back on the thread, I see that you did actually post it. Oops!

Vote: Rox

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:38 am

vote: Ammer

I'm.. not sure I follow the bandwagon on Rox. Are you guys bandwagoning him because his role is strange?

Re: WW35: Hyrule Eclipsed Game Thread

Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:41 am

Apex wrote:vote: Ammer

I'm.. not sure I follow the bandwagon on Rox. Are you guys bandwagoning him because his role is strange?

...

We're bandwagoning him because he's evil. There's been discussion on this for the past 5 pages?
Topic locked