Alex wrote:
[...]
But I'm paying for this site. I'm a premium member. And while I'm not crying out entitlement, I don't believe it's fair of Neopets to threaten to freeze paying users, especially when they're exploiting a Firefox glitch, and dictating what programs users can use on their computers.
As outlined before I believe, ultimately, that
is fair. It is a service. It is a priveledge to use that service; not a right (quoteth IRCnet). When you pay you get additional features however that does not mean you are entitled to a different treatment than non-paying customers. For example, it does not mean you are suddenly allowed to cheat merely because you are a paying customer.
Wether the Firefox bug reference is a bug or a (sloppy) feature is up to debate.
Now, if people decide to vote with their money (and/or start blocking ads and/or stop playing the game; the latter decreasing popularity) it'll in the end settle itself.
Quote:
I know a number of people who use Greasemonkey for their work, as well as other sites.
Like I've mentioned, disabling scripts on Neopets? Not being able to use things such as ImproveNeo? Absolutely fine by me. It's their site; it's their right. I'm not questioning that. But telling me I'm not able to use the site if I use a Firefox extension that I use for other sites - I don't even have ImproveNeo, a popular extension, installed - not cool.
Yes, that is valid point.
How would you implement what they did more fairly still achieving the same goal? If you know (or anyone else), you might want to provide them such feedback. It'd make this new enforcement more fair. I don't see a way how to do that though I don't know that much about the internal, technical workings of Firefox, Greasemonkey and the like.
Another option is not playing Neopets at work (is that really productive? heh) or using 2 seperate browsers or running it under 2 different usernames having 2 different profiles. There are many similar solutions. No, they're not pretty, but the problem can be relatively easy dealt with.