Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:37 am
Daze wrote:The Butterfly Effect.
I have great respect for Ashton Kutcher, after seeing him in such a dramatic role.
An original and outstanding movie with such a dramatic ending, it left me spellbound.
If you watch this on DVD and have special features, listen to the commentary. It provides a very good insight to all the small details of the movie, which played such an important part in getting the whole "mood" of the movie across.
Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:03 am
Chanel wrote:Just saw the 40 Year Old Virgin again. Highly recommended!
Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:16 am
Chanel wrote:Shollia wrote:The Brothers Grimm
Personally... I found the movie to be a big mess.
The story went everywhere.
You couldn't understand half of what was being said by the "french" characters.
And the jokes... uuuugh. Some of them were sort of funny, but then the others...
I dunno what it was... they just weren't executed right. They didn't have any timing to them.
It's like one of those moments would happen and then a minute afterwards it left you wondering if you should've laughed there or not.
I dunno.. it's hard to explain.
The director or writers or whoever must've seriously lacked a sense of humor or something.
The movie could've been really great. It has a really interesting idea... but the movie was just BAD.
It's a shame that the director is Terry Gilliam, a member Monty Python. But anyways, yeah the movie's been getting horrible reviews everywhere. A recurring complaint is that "the movie doesn't know what it's supposed to be: a horror flick, a comedy, or an action picture."
Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:29 pm
Igg wrote:Chanel wrote:Shollia wrote:The Brothers Grimm
Personally... I found the movie to be a big mess.
The story went everywhere.
You couldn't understand half of what was being said by the "french" characters.
And the jokes... uuuugh. Some of them were sort of funny, but then the others...
I dunno what it was... they just weren't executed right. They didn't have any timing to them.
It's like one of those moments would happen and then a minute afterwards it left you wondering if you should've laughed there or not.
I dunno.. it's hard to explain.
The director or writers or whoever must've seriously lacked a sense of humor or something.
The movie could've been really great. It has a really interesting idea... but the movie was just BAD.
It's a shame that the director is Terry Gilliam, a member Monty Python. But anyways, yeah the movie's been getting horrible reviews everywhere. A recurring complaint is that "the movie doesn't know what it's supposed to be: a horror flick, a comedy, or an action picture."
*gets the feeling she may be one of the few people to ever enjoy it*
Jabberwocky (also directed by Gilliam, with Michael Palin in the lead role) got terrible reviews, and I guess technically it is a bit scrapplily done, but I really really like it.
Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:36 pm
Haven't watched it but I know the dude who:MASSIVE SPOILER FOR A MOVIE THAT'S, LIKE, 5 YEARS OLD
(Get Over It. If You Haven't Seen It Yet, I Doubt Its Very High On The List.)
shows up and the girl's door. I don't know if its the real or the alternate ending but that's how it ends. Just a big ol' picture of Larry Hamm. Good guy. I linted him. It felt good. For both of us I'm sure.
mmm... larry linting
Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:59 pm
SpiraLethe wrote:Igg wrote:Chanel wrote:Shollia wrote:The Brothers Grimm
Personally... I found the movie to be a big mess.
The story went everywhere.
You couldn't understand half of what was being said by the "french" characters.
And the jokes... uuuugh. Some of them were sort of funny, but then the others...
I dunno what it was... they just weren't executed right. They didn't have any timing to them.
It's like one of those moments would happen and then a minute afterwards it left you wondering if you should've laughed there or not.
I dunno.. it's hard to explain.
The director or writers or whoever must've seriously lacked a sense of humor or something.
The movie could've been really great. It has a really interesting idea... but the movie was just BAD.
It's a shame that the director is Terry Gilliam, a member Monty Python. But anyways, yeah the movie's been getting horrible reviews everywhere. A recurring complaint is that "the movie doesn't know what it's supposed to be: a horror flick, a comedy, or an action picture."
*gets the feeling she may be one of the few people to ever enjoy it*
Jabberwocky (also directed by Gilliam, with Michael Palin in the lead role) got terrible reviews, and I guess technically it is a bit scrapplily done, but I really really like it.
I was pretty disappointed as well. It was just a bunch of French bashing and special effects. It had funny moments, but over all, it stank. The really funny thing is, I heard Terry Gilliam was bashing his own movie. Heh. I'd see why. It was pretty awful, shallow, and as someone said, messy.
Tue Aug 30, 2005 3:36 pm
Igg wrote:The Thomas Crown Affair- the newer one.
*yawns*
Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:44 pm
Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:40 pm
Igg wrote:Chanel wrote:Shollia wrote:The Brothers Grimm
Personally... I found the movie to be a big mess.
The story went everywhere.
You couldn't understand half of what was being said by the "french" characters.
And the jokes... uuuugh. Some of them were sort of funny, but then the others...
I dunno what it was... they just weren't executed right. They didn't have any timing to them.
It's like one of those moments would happen and then a minute afterwards it left you wondering if you should've laughed there or not.
I dunno.. it's hard to explain.
The director or writers or whoever must've seriously lacked a sense of humor or something.
The movie could've been really great. It has a really interesting idea... but the movie was just BAD.
It's a shame that the director is Terry Gilliam, a member Monty Python. But anyways, yeah the movie's been getting horrible reviews everywhere. A recurring complaint is that "the movie doesn't know what it's supposed to be: a horror flick, a comedy, or an action picture."
*gets the feeling she may be one of the few people to ever enjoy it*
Jabberwocky (also directed by Gilliam, with Michael Palin in the lead role) got terrible reviews, and I guess technically it is a bit scrapplily done, but I really really like it.
Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:54 pm
Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:56 am
Ammer wrote:MyleneFarmer wrote:Did they? Not very fond of the movies, and while I read the books, I tend to miss details. I guess I just always pictured them in their robes, and remembered them usually being in them in the first two movies. Ah well. ^_^
Yup, they did. Remember when Hermione punched Malfoy? That was when they were wearing normal clothes.
Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:17 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:15 am
Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:38 am
halfbakedbliss wrote:Igg wrote:Chanel wrote:Shollia wrote:The Brothers Grimm
Personally... I found the movie to be a big mess.
The story went everywhere.
You couldn't understand half of what was being said by the "french" characters.
And the jokes... uuuugh. Some of them were sort of funny, but then the others...
I dunno what it was... they just weren't executed right. They didn't have any timing to them.
It's like one of those moments would happen and then a minute afterwards it left you wondering if you should've laughed there or not.
I dunno.. it's hard to explain.
The director or writers or whoever must've seriously lacked a sense of humor or something.
The movie could've been really great. It has a really interesting idea... but the movie was just BAD.
It's a shame that the director is Terry Gilliam, a member Monty Python. But anyways, yeah the movie's been getting horrible reviews everywhere. A recurring complaint is that "the movie doesn't know what it's supposed to be: a horror flick, a comedy, or an action picture."
*gets the feeling she may be one of the few people to ever enjoy it*
Jabberwocky (also directed by Gilliam, with Michael Palin in the lead role) got terrible reviews, and I guess technically it is a bit scrapplily done, but I really really like it.
I'm fairly sure I saw Eric Idle as an extra/beggar.
Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:05 am