Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:44 pm
Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:57 pm
Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:27 am
mazil wrote:Hey, my set's on its way (please don't close the comp on me!). It'll be finished in an hour or two.
Great entries so far everyone! I'm blown away by the creativity... so funny
Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:50 pm
Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:05 pm
Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:38 am
Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:14 am
Flame wrote:laq
I'll tell you right now - The fact that you did not make the sig transparent really ruins this. In the av, there's some white spots around the kacheek you didn't get rid of. The shape of the av and placement of the image of the av are also very unique. In the sig, the text pops out at you. Hm, now that I look at it the background also doesn't match the kacheek too well, but it's not bad.
Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:50 am
laq wrote:Flame wrote:laq
I'll tell you right now - The fact that you did not make the sig transparent really ruins this. In the av, there's some white spots around the kacheek you didn't get rid of. The shape of the av and placement of the image of the av are also very unique. In the sig, the text pops out at you. Hm, now that I look at it the background also doesn't match the kacheek too well, but it's not bad.
Uh, I did trans. it.It's saved as a PNG, so perhaps your browser can not see the transparency?
Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:32 am
Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:16 pm
Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:48 pm
Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:58 pm
Flame wrote:My stupid computer is making your sig blurry... Okay. Well, the av is a little plain, and I'm not sure I like how the image is placed in it. I don't think the font choice you've used was the best either. For the sig, I love the main font and the colors in it. I've been told it has the same background as the av, which is good because I believe the main focus here is on the text.
vkceankraz wrote:I love the gel effect that you used for the main text. But you put it underneath a layer of scanlines, which was a bad idea. If you use a slight bevel effect, the perspective is that it's 3-D, which means it should be on top... or it doesn't work. Again, I don't like scanlines to be the prevaling effect for a background. See what you put over the kacheek? Why not use that for the background instead? And uh... the subtext is kind of scary. Kacheeks are supposed to be cute!
Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:37 pm
Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:39 pm
Flame wrote:laq, you're going to have to save it as a gif next time. It has to be in a file where us judges can see the transparency. Because we are rating the set, it's no good if you're the only one who can see it.![]()
Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:36 am
Flame wrote:mazil
The av is cute, but the black text doesn't go. It doesn't go in the sig either. I like the main font choice in the sig (what is it?). The cutout job around the kacheek is also pretty good, and I like how you've place the kacheek on the green bar.