wolftracker wrote:
In the beginning Hamlet was a sane man playing at being insane, but by the time he decides to sent his unsuspecting friends R&G to their deaths he has been playing insane so long that he has become the part.
His unsuspecting "friends" were carrying a letter that was supposed to get
him killed, and Hamlet just pulled a name switch on them. Seems sane enough to me. A tad vengeful, mind, but then this is a classic Elizabethan revenge tragedy after all.
As Hamlet himself notes at one point, he knows a hawk from a handsaw (
i.e., is sane) depending on which way the wind is blowing (that is, when it's safe for him to be sane). It was an act to keep his uncle from considering him a threat & killing him off.
The ghost doesn't really enter into the sanity question, because it was seen by the guards before Hamlet, and by Horatio with Hamlet.
A bigger question for Hamlet -- and a source of much of his indecision -- wasn't whether the ghost existed, but whether it was
really his father or whether it was a demon impersonating his father in order to tempt Hamlet into damning his own soul.
While trying to arrange where his uncle would spend eternity was, as Tharkun mentioned, hubris, it was still in accordance with religious belief of the time. (For those who don't recall, that was the scene where Hamlet had a clear shot to kill his evil uncle Claudius, but didn't take it because Claudius had just finished his prayers and could thus be considered in a state of grace -- eligible for Heaven if he died right then without having sinned again in word, thought, or deed. For some reason, the thought of his father's murderer going to Heaven didn't set well with young Hamlet.)
Pteri Sage -- that sounds like a terrific essay question. Any chance the department chair would allow you to get a copy of your own essay?