For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Thu Sep 01, 2005 6:33 pm
One time could be a powerful innocent. Twice means gaurenteed evil.
Vote: Anubis
Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:18 pm
Anubis (10 Votes) -- Pixa, watericesage, Mandy, Inexistence, Christopher, Twisted Sanity, Alex, Robert, weewoman, sirclucky
10 votes
10 votes needed for first execution // 11 to lock
15 votes needed for first execution // 16 to lock
20 alive
Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:21 pm
Vote: Anubis
Someone told me that she got out of the box. I'll bet you wished to stayed in there, now don't you?
Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:23 pm
Anubis (11 Votes) LOCKED -- Pixa, watericesage, Mandy, Inexistence, Christopher, Twisted Sanity, Alex, Robert, weewoman, sirclucky, DiscordantNote
10 votes
10 votes needed for first execution // 11 to lock
15 votes needed for first execution // 16 to lock
20 alive
Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:01 pm
I wonder why Lupin didn't do anything at the full moon last night? Unless it was Lupin that got the power to revive Req.. *shrugs*
Welcome back Req
And yay another lock on Anubis. Geez, just...die already XD
Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:02 pm
Maybe he didn't want to slip up and kill an innocent?
I don't know about you, but I have no suspects.
Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:09 pm
I'm also going to Vote: Anubis once again. You really must stop avoiding execution.
Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:52 pm
Ammer, your posts say first execution twice. It isn't supposed to be like that, right? (I'm not sure

)
Anyways.
Vote: Anubis
Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:45 pm
Maybe it is a special condition and we will have to get to the second barrier to be able to execute?
Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:00 am
Do my votes matter at all
I don't think Ammer will be executed tonight, but it's better than nothing I guess
Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:35 am
Kay, so. New suspect. sirclucky refuses to tell me anyting about his role, and is trying to dodge the matter by making up crap about how it's illegal for him to send me his sheet, which we all know is bull because A. It's not in the rules, and B, Ammer has already posted it on the thread that, well, pretty much anyhting goes so long as it stays in private conversation.
so.
Vote: Anubis
Vote: sirclucky
Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:05 am
Hogwarts, what a quiet day it is. Nothing seems to be happening at all.
---
Night begins...
Also, considering this is my fault, showing your role through PM is NOT allowed anymore. I know I didn't address this before as many did but I think it's time to stop the madness. Therefore, yes Requiem I did tell sirclucky it wasn't allowed so he wasn't lying.
Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:10 am
Alright, new question. Is it just the complete role sheet that's not allowed? Thus, are we still free to reveal our role in private converations; as long as it's not a direct quote of the sheet?
Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:12 am
.:Requiem:. wrote:Alright, new question. Is it just the complete role sheet that's not allowed? Thus, are we still free to reveal our role in private converations; as long as it's not a direct quote of the sheet?
Yes.
Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:15 am
Thought so. Thanks.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.