Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:19 pm
Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:47 pm
Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:55 pm
Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:56 pm
Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:59 pm
.:Requiem:. wrote:Trash my day, how 'bout?
Yeesh, the irony in this is sickening. I went along hating the crap out of my old subtext, and all the predictable ones that followed that same format get good ratings...and I tried to focus on something different in he sig, which the judges usually like, and spent forever trying to phrase it well....and you hate it. That'll teach teach me to try to be creative instead of generic and predictable. -slap- Bad Renn.
Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:06 pm
.:Requiem:. wrote:Trash my day, how 'bout?
Yeesh, the irony in this is sickening. I went along hating the crap out of my old subtext, and all the predictable ones that followed that same format get good ratings...and I tried to focus on something different in he sig, which the judges usually like, and spent forever trying to phrase it well....and you hate it. That'll teach teach me to try to be creative instead of generic and predictable. -slap- Bad Renn.
Wed Oct 26, 2005 11:41 pm
Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:31 am
Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:58 am
Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:24 pm
Robert wrote:Judges, please rate and review these subtexts by Friday October 28. Please pick 3 people to eliminate.
.:Compact Disk:.
Furby! *fade* A Furry Bee? Where?
You've proved you're a fan of the wordplay, which I am as well. But like Twinkle said, it's repetitive to have the word "Furby" in it. If I had a set with the main text "Creator of the Universe", it wouldn't make sense to have the subtext be "Creator of the Universe", too, right?
.:Requiem:.
Blue-eyed Beauty
Again like Twinkle said, this is too serious for the sig. The furby to me, besides looking like it's going to eat me, doesn't look "beautiful". I think "cutie" would be a better word.
Ammer
Evil is the new cute.
Pretty cliche, but it works. It describes the furby well, the only thing you're missing in it is originality.
Anoohilator
A cute bundle of DOOM!
I like it. We all know furbies are demonic beings, but we have to admit they are rather cute. Good job.
Khristian
Cute.....*Fade out**Fade in*Just Met Evil.*Fade out*
Again, it's cliche. And the fade is very unnessasary. It does work, though.
matterbug
Bri-frightening up your day
I like it! Nothing more to say except you've proved yourself to be getting really good at this.
pattypus
I could be your friend *fade* or I could be your foe
I'm iffy on it. It's not bad, but it's not the greatest either. The problem I have with it is originality, which it really lacks. Like Twinkle said, I do like how you used 'foe' instead of something with the word evil.
the_dog_god
Fur me ? *squeal*
Not something I would expect out of a mostly sane male (especially the squealing) but it works, and it works very well. Good job.
VeraX
Not your average furry friend.
This one is really boring and cliche. Seriously, how many "Not your average whatever" phrases are used in subtexts, life, whatever? You get points for using furry friend, however, because too many people went with the evil theme this time.
Thu Oct 27, 2005 2:15 pm
Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:01 pm
Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:07 pm
.:Compact Disk:. wrote:"Furby! *fade* A furry bee? Where?"
The first bit was meant to be one person speaking and the second another who knows nothing about furbies...
Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:39 pm
.:Requiem:. wrote:Trash my day, how 'bout?
Yeesh, the irony in this is sickening. I went along hating the crap out of my old subtext, and all the predictable ones that followed that same format get good ratings...and I tried to focus on something different in he sig, which the judges usually like, and spent forever trying to phrase it well....and you hate it. That'll teach teach me to try to be creative instead of generic and predictable. -slap- Bad Renn.
Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:40 am