Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:22 am
Slime Lord wrote:matterbug wrote:Slime Lord wrote:Kyra wrote:I don't believe in ghosts at all. o_o They're just something made up to scare people.
Uh, that's just hurtful! It's Halloween! Ghost's have been aroudn since man has started to record anything, Ghosts have been around in all cultures of life for thousands of years.
I think they're real because to many cultures and places had them. Just as I personally believe there is more than just a 'god' because so hundreds of cultures have a pantheon of gods.
There is just to much coinencedence to say otherwise...least in my eyes.
Ummm.. she's allowed to voice her opinion, whether it is Halloween or not. Everyone has a right to believe what they want to or don't want to believe in.
*ghost pops in and tackles Matt* :O
I completely respect it too you guys, I know she is. I was just saying it in a loose manner.
The one time I don't put a damn smiley face in and I get two posts towards me...
Just for the record, mine wasn't against you.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:32 am
Paul wrote:I appreciate that a lot, however, the survey relates specifically to British people.
The "um" made it seem like I was referring to the article, but I was referring to the topic in general.
Ginger Harp Seal Pup wrote:I also saw something in a photo I'd taken in Wales. Me and my mom looked at a photo and saw a very bright white 'thing'. It took the shape of a very deformed person. Usually, stuff like that wouldn't bother me but this was different because this 'thing' was hovering over a grave stone.
That's pretty intresting..
Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:59 am
Kitten Medli wrote:The "um" made it seem like I was referring to the article, but I was referring to the topic in general.
You worded it like you were refering to the article
Kyra wrote:I don't believe in ghosts at all. o_o They're just something made up to scare people.
I believe that too, and I laugh at my classmates who look up paranormal sites on their computers. They don't exist.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 7:52 am
Paul wrote:Kitten Medli wrote:The "um" made it seem like I was referring to the article, but I was referring to the topic in general.
You worded it like you were refering to the article
I just said that. :P
Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:24 pm
Medli, did you really feel the desperate urge to quote my post simply to put four dots in answer to it? ;_; Even if your 'um' was referring to the topic, I find quoting my post and simply replying with dots is offensive.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:38 pm
Anubis wrote:Medli, did you really feel the desperate urge to quote my post simply to put four dots in answer to it? ;_; Even if your 'um' was referring to the topic, I find quoting my post and simply replying with dots is offensive.
I'm sure she didn't mean to offend you
Come on now, guys, play along nicely
Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:24 pm
No, I don't believe in them. If there was some sort of way to prove their existence scientifically, then maybe I would believe in them, but at the moment I think all we have is anecdotal evidence.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:48 pm
Miss Padfoot wrote:No, I don't believe in them. If there was some sort of way to prove their existence scientifically, then maybe I would believe in them, but at the moment I think all we have is anecdotal evidence.
That pretty much sums it up for me as well. Thanks, Miss Padfoot.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:50 pm
Miss Padfoot wrote:No, I don't believe in them. If there was some sort of way to prove their existence scientifically, then maybe I would believe in them, but at the moment I think all we have is anecdotal evidence.
Then you should watch Ghost Hunters on SciFi. They're out to disproove for the most part. That is why I like Ghost Hunters (TAPS) so much, because they want to disproove instead of proove it. So, if they see an Orb they don't go saying "OOH! A GHOST!" they're like "meh, a ball of energy. woopie do, do we have ACTUAL evidence?" Then, if they do have any evidence, they try to copy it again to see if it might have been someone in the place they're at, or if it was actually something paranormal.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:55 pm
I may check it out. When is it on?
Tue Nov 01, 2005 5:52 pm
Ginger Harp Seal Pup wrote:Anubis wrote:Medli, did you really feel the desperate urge to quote my post simply to put four dots in answer to it? ;_; Even if your 'um' was referring to the topic, I find quoting my post and simply replying with dots is offensive.
I'm sure she didn't mean to offend you :)
Come on now, guys, play along nicely ;)
Honestly, I didn't. I'm really sorry, Anubis. I didn't mean it to YOU in any way. My intentions were not to offend you at all.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:01 pm
Kitten Medli wrote:Paul wrote:Kitten Medli wrote:The "um" made it seem like I was referring to the article, but I was referring to the topic in general.
You worded it like you were refering to the article
I just said that.
The <i>entire</i> sentence, not just 'um'.
Tue Nov 01, 2005 7:49 pm
Yes. too many strange coincidances for me to not.
But then i dont buy the usual interpritation of a ghost (and Angels/Daemons etc etc)
But then i dont buy the usual interpritation of a ghost (and Angels/Daemons etc etc)
Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:03 pm
Paul wrote:Kitten Medli wrote:Paul wrote:Kitten Medli wrote:The "um" made it seem like I was referring to the article, but I was referring to the topic in general.
You worded it like you were refering to the article
I just said that. :P
The <i>entire</i> sentence, not just 'um'.
Well, I edited it lastnight. I hope its clearer now.