WW REBIRTH (XII) (GRAVEYARD)

Message

Kugetsu · #106 Post by **Kugetsu** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:05 am

Yay... we lost Dyl. -_-;;

Why'd we vote for him? o_o

Edit - Nevermind, only Tom did. x_x

Alex · #107 Post by **Alex** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:22 am

Bah, I died.

Though that did solve my problem of being really sick and not being able to get online the next couple of days and having to work something out with Scott ;P

Something I've noted.. looks like there's 2 of some roles. 2 shamans.. I don't know if it extends to others, though.

Christopher · #108 Post by **Christopher** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:41 am

Didn't this happen last time (or maybe the time before) when all the dreamers died over the course of a few nights?

Caesara · #109 Post by **Caesara** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:59 am

AHAHAHA.

I always die early.

Too bad I was useful this time.

Thankoo, mafia. /sarcasm

Kugetsu · #110 Post by **Kugetsu** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:44 pm

Christopher wrote:Didn't this happen last time (or maybe the time before) when all the dreamers died over the course of a few nights?

I know in Werewolf 2, the mystic, angel, and archangel were all killed within the first day or so. I was the Shaman, but had computer problems and couldn't get online. I came back the next day to see a majority on me and then die. x) It was actually amusing though. =P

Wind, the reason his role was useful is that if he lied, he got the protection and "Dyl lies" (or whatever it was) wouldn't be put on the thread. If he asked if let's say, "Wind is a Mafia member" and the message came up "Dyl lies", then Wind would in fact be a member of the mafia. =P He was kinda of like a semi-dreamer.

(of course, I'm not absolutely saying that Wind is mafia... ... ... or am I? x) )

Dyl · #111 Post by **Dyl** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:12 pm

I was innocent.
Yes, lying would protect me, somewhat, during night.
I think it would work as a dream-ish type thing too, but I'd get no protection if my statement was, in fact, true.
Go Icey!

Kugetsu · #112 Post by **Kugetsu** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:35 pm

Wow, are you guys really only playing this game to win? That's very unfortunate. o_o

Caesara · #113 Post by **Caesara** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:36 pm

You never know, someone may be playing to lose.

(*Dranzer*) · #114 Post by **(*Dranzer*)** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:08 pm

Caesara wrote:You never know, someone may be playing to lose.

I don't play to win. That's irrational. Instead I play to bring as many people to the grave as possible before and after I die. My "Contribution" to the game.

Caesara · #115 Post by **Caesara** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:10 am

(*Dranzer*) wrote:
Caesara wrote:You never know, someone may be playing to lose.

I don't play to win. That's irrational. Instead I play to bring as many people to the grave as possible before and after I die. My "Contribution" to the game.

I.. play to win.

Is there anything else to play for?

'Contributing' is playing to win, dear. Even if you die, your team still has the chance to win--your contribution helps that.

And wait--after you die?

Alex · #116 Post by **Alex** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:23 am

Caesara wrote:
(*Dranzer*) wrote:
Caesara wrote:You never know, someone may be playing to lose.

I don't play to win. That's irrational. Instead I play to bring as many people to the grave as possible before and after I die. My "Contribution" to the game.

I.. play to win.

Is there anything else to play for?

'Contributing' is playing to win, dear. Even if you die, your team still has the chance to win--your contribution helps that.

And wait--after you die?

Planting suspicions on the Graveyard thread, which the alive players read, I assume.

I play to win too.

If you ask me, deliberately playing so that your friends will stay to the end, even if they're evil, is pretty damn selfish. Sure, a couple of times when I was evil I kept friends in the game - because I knew they could help me out with eliminating the other bad teams. But just playing to keep my friends in.. that's a bit unfair for the others, no?

Blk Mage · #117 Post by **Blk Mage** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:27 am

I thought WW is about winning, when I say "win" i'm not talking about hard-core winning, but winning with a style of sort. Because I don't really get how you could play a game of WW without a mindset of heading towards the end? I mean sure you can cause havok and all that fun stuff in playing but you don't do it because you want to lose? I agree with the playing to win, I don't get how you could play the game without a little aspect of winning even if it is marginal, it's necessary isn't it?

Kugetsu · #118 Post by **Kugetsu** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:39 am

Not that this is really on topic... at all, but:

Caesara wrote:'Contributing' is playing to win, dear. Even if you die, your team still has the chance to win--your contribution helps that.

"Playing to win" is a mindset, not an action. You can still easily contribute and not be in that mindset.

Blk Mage wrote:I thought WW is about winning, when I say "win" i'm not talking about hard-core winning, but winning with a style of sort. Because I don't really get how you could play a game of WW without a mindset of heading towards the end? I mean sure you can cause havok and all that fun stuff in playing but you don't do it because you want to lose? I agree with the playing to win, I don't get how you could play the game without a little aspect of winning even if it is marginal, it's necessary isn't it?

If you only play to win, it doesn't mean that you want to win while you're playing, it means you only play because you want to win (you wouldn't even necessarily have to like the game).. o_0

WIS · #119 Post by **WIS** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:12 am

*gigglesnort*

*gigglesnorts some more*

Go WWs!

Ixistant · #120 Post by **Ixistant** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 4:46 pm

To be honest, I play for fun. That, and to muck with peoples minds while implimenting a clever plan that usually benefits my team. Like when I screwed with your minds this game so my team mate could...