Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:22 pm
Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:32 pm
Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:35 pm
Hikari wrote:Meowclops anyone?.
Regardless, it's a little disturbing. Personally I think it's better off.
They should stuff it and put it up in a museum!.
Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:48 pm
Bangel wrote:Hikari wrote:Meowclops anyone?.
Regardless, it's a little disturbing. Personally I think it's better off.
They should stuff it and put it up in a museum!.
That's something I would have a problem with.
If you're going to use it to advance science and help other animals, fine. But if you're going to make it a stuffed animal and shove it in a place where it will mostly likely be mocked continuosly, you're sick.
Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:59 pm
Fiddelysquat wrote:Bangel wrote:Hikari wrote:Meowclops anyone?.
Regardless, it's a little disturbing. Personally I think it's better off.
They should stuff it and put it up in a museum!.
That's something I would have a problem with.
If you're going to use it to advance science and help other animals, fine. But if you're going to make it a stuffed animal and shove it in a place where it will mostly likely be mocked continuosly, you're sick.
Why do you think the picture was posted on the internet? The cat is dead, and frankly, it's an oddity. Why shouldn't it be on display in a science museum or something?
Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:06 pm
ahoteinrun wrote:Fiddelysquat wrote:Bangel wrote:Hikari wrote:Meowclops anyone?.
Regardless, it's a little disturbing. Personally I think it's better off.
They should stuff it and put it up in a museum!.
That's something I would have a problem with.
If you're going to use it to advance science and help other animals, fine. But if you're going to make it a stuffed animal and shove it in a place where it will mostly likely be mocked continuosly, you're sick.
Why do you think the picture was posted on the internet? The cat is dead, and frankly, it's an oddity. Why shouldn't it be on display in a science museum or something?
Most museums are places of research anyways. Scientific and historical museums normally have quite a few artefacts and specimins that aren't viewable by the public and that are not on display. This specimin would probably be kept in a jar and used for science later; either that or skinned/disected and then stuffed and kept in storage.
Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:18 am
Bangel wrote:Hikari wrote:Meowclops anyone?.
Regardless, it's a little disturbing. Personally I think it's better off.
They should stuff it and put it up in a museum!.
That's something I would have a problem with.
If you're going to use it to advance science and help other animals, fine. But if you're going to make it a stuffed animal and shove it in a place where it will mostly likely be mocked continuosly, you're sick.
Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:25 am
Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:42 am
Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:52 am
Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:56 am
Bangel wrote:If you were horribly disfigured, would you want to be stuffed and hung in a museum, regardless of whether you had died or not?
Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:38 am
Bangel wrote:If you were horribly disfigured, would you want to be stuffed and hung in a museum, regardless of whether you had died or not?
Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:17 am
ahoteinrun wrote:There's some terrifying art exhibit of chopped up people plastified floating around right now (REAL PEOPLE!) who are dead, that are on display and it's all done through donations (or it's supposed to have been, can't remember if that ones the one with the controversy or not). There are museums out there specifically for this thing, for people who have physical dissabilities.
Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:11 pm