Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:04 am
looks like were not off to a very good start maybe we should have voted fm 
I'm not going to vote first this time i'll hold off.
Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:38 am
How do you peaceful siblings expect to get anything done in your current status ? Stop writing stern letters and beef it up!
Now drop and give me twenty
1...
Beef it up!
2...
Beef it up!
3...
Now drop and give me twenty
1...
Beef it up!
2...
Beef it up!
3...
Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:32 am
Ok suspence is still killing me Once again I'm going to be brave and vote to get things started.
vote: Tested and, Vote compactdisc
Once again for inactiveity. They are the only ones that have not posted. It makes a better death then mod kills. They still have time to redeem themselves.
Edit Unvote tested Sorry I missed your post right before the execution.
That leaves me with one vote to spare.
vote: Tested and, Vote compactdisc
Once again for inactiveity. They are the only ones that have not posted. It makes a better death then mod kills. They still have time to redeem themselves.
Edit Unvote tested Sorry I missed your post right before the execution.
That leaves me with one vote to spare.
Last edited by Chipper on Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:36 am
Vote: TDG
Too much randomness. Who knows whether there'll be a posting requirement among it?
Too much randomness. Who knows whether there'll be a posting requirement among it?
Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:39 am
*yawn*
I'm tired, I read over the execution and night scene. Nothing out of the ordinary really, I'll do whatever tomorrow. I suggest a dreamer check out Chipper as well. She could easily be a baddie who is possibly trying to manipulate the executions so that they stay away from her. Maybe not, but even if she isn't, it could turn out backfiring on her in the end (as in one of the "inactives" coming back just to see a majoirty on them, etc. etc. etc.)
If they're inactive, then Pixa will probably modkill them or replace them. I'm sure he's got something planned for them.
I'm tired, I read over the execution and night scene. Nothing out of the ordinary really, I'll do whatever tomorrow. I suggest a dreamer check out Chipper as well. She could easily be a baddie who is possibly trying to manipulate the executions so that they stay away from her. Maybe not, but even if she isn't, it could turn out backfiring on her in the end (as in one of the "inactives" coming back just to see a majoirty on them, etc. etc. etc.)
If they're inactive, then Pixa will probably modkill them or replace them. I'm sure he's got something planned for them.
Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:42 am
Actually, Kuge, if she was a baddie, I thinks she'd be trying to go after the actives... after all, inactives wouldn't pose any harm to her. They aren't doing anything! And I mean that in a literal sense.
But you never know. You never know...
But you never know. You never know...
Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:50 am
Kugetsu wrote:*yawn*
I'm tired, I read over the execution and night scene. Nothing out of the ordinary really, I'll do whatever tomorrow. I suggest a dreamer check out Chipper as well. She could easily be a baddie who is possibly trying to manipulate the executions so that they stay away from her. Maybe not, but even if she isn't, it could turn out backfiring on her in the end (as in one of the "inactives" coming back just to see a majoirty on them, etc. etc. etc.)
If they're inactive, then Pixa will probably modkill them or replace them. I'm sure he's got something planned for them.
Really I have nothing to loose. My quite reserved ways seem to have gotten me killed.
Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:51 am
That could be as well. The problem is that these people will probably end up modkilled or replaced anyway, by executing them, she's keeping us from executing someone who could possibly be on her team (aka, anyone else who is active). At least by getting rid of inactives, that ensures that no one on her team has any chance of being executed. But of course, that's if she's bad and if she's thinking in that way.
Or... something like that...
(then again, your way is more likely, but how do we know she's not making some kind of mistake, or that I'm making it a custom to accuse her every game for no reason? :3)
I just think it's way too early to start the inactive voting. I mean, Urthdigger was executed Day 1 for being inactive. Though they have gotten more time here than in the average game, I still think it's too early to execute those that could end up being active members or replaced with active members just because they're inactive during day 1. :\ Usually it's day 3 or 4 when inactive voting seems to start
Of course, they could be bad, but I'd rather worry about the active baddies than the inactive ones.
All I'm saying is that Chipper may or may not be bad, but either way, I just don't think it necessarily a good idea to go after the two (yes, she voted two people, eager no?) because the vote was started on them (mostly because I know that a lot of people are going to go for the first vote they see.)
The problem is that these people will probably end up modkilled or replaced anyway, by executing them, she's keeping us from executing someone who could possibly be on her team (aka, anyone else who is active). At least by getting rid of inactives, that ensures that no one on her team has any chance of being executed. But of course, that's if she's bad and if she's thinking in that way.
Or... something like that...
(then again, your way is more likely, but how do we know she's not making some kind of mistake, or that I'm making it a custom to accuse her every game for no reason? :3)
I just think it's way too early to start the inactive voting. I mean, Urthdigger was executed Day 1 for being inactive. Though they have gotten more time here than in the average game, I still think it's too early to execute those that could end up being active members or replaced with active members just because they're inactive during day 1. :\ Usually it's day 3 or 4 when inactive voting seems to start
Of course, they could be bad, but I'd rather worry about the active baddies than the inactive ones.
All I'm saying is that Chipper may or may not be bad, but either way, I just don't think it necessarily a good idea to go after the two (yes, she voted two people, eager no?) because the vote was started on them (mostly because I know that a lot of people are going to go for the first vote they see.)
Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:19 am
Get well soon Pixa xP
lol, I will not vote yet.
lol, I will not vote yet.
Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:16 am
Robert wrote:Argh, another goodie. But the avenging siblings were a good team with a bad name. Maybe the peaceful siblings are a bad team with a good name
We'll get to know once Pixa remembers to edit his first post and colour sirlucky's name to either green or red xP
Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:14 am
To be fair... CD is kinda... Unposty...
Vote: CD
Vote: CD
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:26 pm
Well, I'm really confused by this game.
Peaceful siblings? What use is that?
Peaceful siblings? What use is that?
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:22 pm
Yeah. I really don't know who to vote for today, so I'll just bandwagon. =P
Vote: .:CD:.
He has been rather quiet, after all.
Vote: .:CD:.
He has been rather quiet, after all.
Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:02 pm
Vote: CD
Yay bandwagon.
Note to you guys - I'm not gonna be as active as I normally would be. I have Year 12, and my assessments have already started (2 weeks in. Stupid teachers); plus I'm running a large portion of the biggest event of the school year. So yeah - not much time for WW.
Yay bandwagon.
Note to you guys - I'm not gonna be as active as I normally would be. I have Year 12, and my assessments have already started (2 weeks in. Stupid teachers); plus I'm running a large portion of the biggest event of the school year. So yeah - not much time for WW.
Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:55 pm
Vote - .:CD:.