Altador Plot Split #24

For Neopets ONLY discussion.

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
silhouette169
PPT Baby
PPT Baby
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:51 am
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Updates?

#166 Post by silhouette169 »

JhasNeeh wrote:EDIT: Just for future reference, the Neopets team is normally shortened to TNT.


Thanks! I knew that somewhere in my brain but got my wires crossed.
Tribble? What's a Tribble? - oh, it's cute. I think I'll take one home :)
Pink
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: In A Place That Has Much Raininess...
Contact:

#167 Post by Pink »

Thanks farside! That clarifies even more!

I can see how someone may say that it, the Dancer some assume is correct, doesn't match the glyph. This would be assuming each star represents a cymbal on the tamborine. However, if each star didn't necessarily represent a cymbal, then it would still work.

Another thing we have to remember is that the sky is growing with each clue. More stars are being added each time. This would make me think that all of the constellations are not necessarily in our sky as we see it now.
Image
farside
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:01 pm

#168 Post by farside »

pinkflamingonewsgirl wrote:I can see how someone may say that it, the Dancer some assume is correct, doesn't match the glyph. This would be assuming each star represents a cymbal on the tamborine. However, if each star didn't necessarily represent a cymbal, then it would still work.


That is true.

If the jewel formations above the statues are based on correct proportions, I guess that would be a way to doublecheck. In other words, does the proposed solution match proportionately to a set of jewels above the statue of The Dancer? And can a different set of points be formed from those jewels to better match the overlay or glyph? If the first answer is yes and the second answer is no, then the proposed solution is probably correct.
miss___momo
PPT Baby
PPT Baby
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:12 pm
Location: Canada

#169 Post by miss___momo »

farside wrote:
pinkflamingonewsgirl wrote:I can see how someone may say that it, the Dancer some assume is correct, doesn't match the glyph. This would be assuming each star represents a cymbal on the tamborine. However, if each star didn't necessarily represent a cymbal, then it would still work.


That is true.

If the jewel formations above the statues are based on correct proportions, I guess that would be a way to doublecheck. In other words, does the proposed solution match proportionately to a set of jewels above the statue of The Dancer? And can a different set of points be formed from those jewels to better match the overlay or glyph? If the first answer is yes and the second answer is no, then the proposed solution is probably correct.


I agree. Does anyone have a glyph for the Dancer I can double-check?
Image
User avatar
Krock122
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida
Contact:

#170 Post by Krock122 »

miss___momo wrote:
I agree. Does anyone have a glyph for the Dancer I can double-check?


go here and it will give it for you

http://ricall.freehostia.com/findconst.php
farside
PPT Toddler
PPT Toddler
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:01 pm

#171 Post by farside »

miss___momo wrote:Does anyone have a glyph for the Dancer I can double-check?


They can be found at this link,

http://www.hidebehind.com/2391E500

though I don't know if they have been resized. I guess you can check that by comparing the size of the Sleeper and Dreamer pics to what you see in your telescope.
JhasNeeh
PPT Student
PPT Student
Posts: 406
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:20 am
Contact:

#172 Post by JhasNeeh »

pinkflamingonewsgirl wrote:Thanks farside! That clarifies even more!

I can see how someone may say that it, the Dancer some assume is correct, doesn't match the glyph. This would be assuming each star represents a cymbal on the tamborine. However, if each star didn't necessarily represent a cymbal, then it would still work.

Another thing we have to remember is that the sky is growing with each clue. More stars are being added each time. This would make me think that all of the constellations are not necessarily in our sky as we see it now.


If you check the TCG card, they do match up with the cymbals. And the gems are stretched on the x axis. If you look at the DF set, the lines are far steeper than the actual stars. I'm still sure this is a big set-up.

EDIT: To go along with the Weezels plotting:

Image
ImageImageImageImage
miss___momo
PPT Baby
PPT Baby
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:12 pm
Location: Canada

#173 Post by miss___momo »

Krock122 wrote:
miss___momo wrote:
I agree. Does anyone have a glyph for the Dancer I can double-check?


go here and it will give it for you

http://ricall.freehostia.com/findconst.php


Thanks. ^^
Image
iconoplast
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 8:19 pm
Location: a state of perpetual shock

#174 Post by iconoplast »

Image
Locked