That's fine then. I just wasn't sure if you'd get into trouble for it, that's all. I might be thinking of a different forum, though. I can definitely remember a place that is strict about posts not being a certain length.
"I am a sly cat, I am a summer wind, I am birds in flight, I am the sun, I am the sea, I am me!"
Ginger Harp Seal Pup wrote:Regarding the emoticon issue:
That's fine then. I just wasn't sure if you'd get into trouble for it, that's all. I might be thinking of a different forum, though. I can definitely remember a place that is strict about posts not being a certain length.
You're not imagining it Ginger - It's a guideline on this forum that posts should be of a reasonable length. I think that the first post in a topic can potentially be an exception, like in this case, as the title of the thread says what he wanted to say. If he'd replied to a post with just " " that would have been at least frowned upon. Make sence?
Back before the reboot before the most recent reboot, there was a soft "three word rule" for posts. You'd often see someone make a one-word reply, and in very tiny font, write, "This is not spam."
I actually miss that rule - I always thought that was kinda funny.
Rachel wrote:You're not imagining it Ginger - It's a guideline on this forum that posts should be of a reasonable length. I think that the first post in a topic can potentially be an exception, like in this case, as the title of the thread says what he wanted to say. If he'd replied to a post with just " " that would have been at least frowned upon. Make sence?
You do realize that makes me want to reply to a post with just right?
"Oh, better far to live and die/Under the brave black flag I fly/Than play a sanctimonious part/With a pirate head and a pirate heart."
*yawns* Anyways. Back on topic now shall we? I do believe Mark just got punched by someone and that some other heinous person is going to shove some bugs up Marks nose.
" that would have been at least frowned upon. Make sence?
