For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:53 am

Completely unharmed is protected I guess.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:18 am

I can vouch for DM, as well.

Leave Alex alone, ya big meanies! :(

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:28 am

If Alex dies tonight, I will not be happy with you, bird person >.> Not at all.

*Sits back and enjoys the safe day*

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:44 am

does anyone else find it odd that there was two warxelo's?
@_@
i had to read that about 3 times because i thought Pickles may have confused herself for warxelo XD
After seeing that Rubay was rezzed right after Rachel was killed, i just don't feel too comfortable.....I think there has been alot of role switching with the rezzes as well as heiring off.
:thinking:

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:15 am

I am finding it hard to believe that Rachel's heiring, would be in the form of a resurrection - a day later. Maybe if it was the following night after she was executed. But then again, pretty much anything can go in terms of WW.

I caught the doubleesque warxelo thing as well, it seems a bit odd.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:17 pm

I'm still finding it hard to believe that Ruby is still innocent. Yes, she may still have her original role, but that doesn't mean she's still innocent. I know in other games, I've had conversions where the person kept their original role, but their alignment changed. I will continue voting Ruby until someone claims her resurrection, either publicly or through PM.

Vote: Rubywinged

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:29 pm

Vote: Warxelo

For that pretty piece of magic that got him out of being killed by the Avada. Is duplicating yourself part of your role? I don't remember any sort of spell like that in the books.

*Goes back to the hospital wing*

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:52 pm

are you kidding me? I was protected by rubywinged. She admitted it two posts after the night results and if you look at when I was attacked two nights ago, there was no "doubling" :roll:

Vote: fzun

for not reading...

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:54 pm

May wrote:I'm still finding it hard to believe that Ruby is still innocent. Yes, she may still have her original role, but that doesn't mean she's still innocent. I know in other games, I've had conversions where the person kept their original role, but their alignment changed. I will continue voting Ruby until someone claims her resurrection, either publicly or through PM.

Question: if someone keeps their original role but their alignment changes, do they keep all their powers, too? It seems weird that an evil would function as a protector -- but warxelo's protection was definitely Tonks's work last night (she's a Metamorphmagus, remember?). Unless protection roles can be heired off?

sneaking on at work here, so I won't be able to respond until ~2pm NST

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:59 pm

I don't really think she was rezzed evil, based on that protection. She knew I was attacked by the Avada two nights ago and protected me thinking they'll attack again.

Don't know why those Avada people keep attacking me though...

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:36 pm

Siniri wrote:Question: if someone keeps their original role but their alignment changes, do they keep all their powers, too? It seems weird that an evil would function as a protector -- but warxelo's protection was definitely Tonks's work last night (she's a Metamorphmagus, remember?). Unless protection roles can be heired off?

sneaking on at work here, so I won't be able to respond until ~2pm NST


It can happen. I was in a game once where I started off as an OMT. I got two conversions in the game and whoever I converted was able to keep their original role. I happened to find the protector against the other evil night kill and converted her to my team so she could protect me each night. It worked beautifully 'cos everyone thought she was still innocent since she kept her role.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:04 pm

warxelo wrote:are you kidding me? I was protected by rubywinged. She admitted it two posts after the night results and if you look at when I was attacked two nights ago, there was no "doubling" :roll:

Vote: fzun

for not reading...


It hasn't been confirmed that Ruby is still an innocent protector, so, I feel I am still within the lines.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:36 pm

Vote: warxelo
Vote: Rubywinged


Most probable for the time being...will change later if my mind can be persuaded to do so.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:06 pm

Vote: Rubywinged
Vote: warxelo
I are confused.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:21 pm

Hansy wrote:Oh, I mis-interpreted his role then. In that case, we should let him prove he wasn't converted by handing out some SP...


I'M A SHE! D:
*impales self*

Vote: warxelo
Vote: Rubywinged


Bandwagonnn...

EDIT -
May wrote:Mod Note: If you are currently playing the game, you should not be posting in this thread. Players and non-players may carry on conversations, but each must post on the correct thread.


That's lol-some in more ways than you know...XD
Topic locked