Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:10 pm
Vote: Tom.
...Still not a chocobo.
...Still not a chocobo.
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:20 pm
Vote: Pixa
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:37 pm
Like someone else mentioned, are we sure that Pixa attacked? If they just 'targeted', and Rachel avoided being killed, couldn't Pixa have been a protector or something?
I dunno. It's 1:30am. I don't do thinking at this hour.
I dunno. It's 1:30am. I don't do thinking at this hour.
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:02 pm
Right...they just said "targeted," but it's awfully coincidental and we have no other leads.
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:38 pm
Target does not mean attack, but not many people will have targeted Rachel last night. It is possible Tom is the Ballroom protector, but it's also quite possible he's evil.
If someone besides Tom is the Ballroom protector, they should contact someone; Miyu may be a choice, being recently rezzed.
Vote: Pixa
If someone besides Tom is the Ballroom protector, they should contact someone; Miyu may be a choice, being recently rezzed.
Vote: Pixa
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:27 pm
FYI, the daykill on Pixa was NOT me, as CW would know if he'd bothered to read the plot. I used my two attacks on Ammer, which leads me to believe CW was bandwagoning and, when confronted, tried to cover it up.
Vote: Pixa
Vote: CWisgood
Vote: Pixa
Vote: CWisgood
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:08 pm
Vote: Pixa since all of the cool kids are doing it. If you have proof otherwise, I'll change my vote.
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:10 pm
Well, it's certainly hard to have proof, but I'm up for roletrading with anyone. 
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:28 pm
Tom, roletrade with me please. xD
I think I'm the only one who isn't jumping at you with a knife to your throat.
You still did not explain the jump from target to attack. Evading much?
I think I'm the only one who isn't jumping at you with a knife to your throat.
You still did not explain the jump from target to attack. Evading much?
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:33 pm
Unvote: Tom
Vote: Nobody
I dunno D:
Vote: Nobody
I dunno D:
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:31 am
Move: The Gallery
Vote: Pink
Vote: Rachel
I'm not convinced.
Vote: Pink
Vote: Rachel
I'm not convinced.
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:36 am
Vote: Pixa
Vote: CWisgood
Vote: CWisgood
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:12 am
Typhoon wrote:FYI, the daykill on Pixa was NOT me, as CW would know if he'd bothered to read the plot. I used my two attacks on Ammer, which leads me to believe CW was bandwagoning and, when confronted, tried to cover it up.
Vote: Pixa
Vote: CWisgood
You said, and I quote, "Bang. Bang." which I logically assumed to be gunshots, not uppercuts or laser beams. Sorry if I'm actually using logic.
And I did read the plot. If the plot clearly specified who carried out which kill, the game would be over a bit too soon, don't you think?
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:35 am
Blargh, I'm confused. I have a lot to reread.
Vote: Pixa
Vote: Pixa
Re: WW 34: WW @ Half-Malignant Half-Castle - Day 5
Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:50 am
Come on people, don't just vote for me despite people having roletraded and unvoted me. >_> That's MINDLESS bandwagoning. Zombiesque, one could say...