Sat Apr 16, 2005 3:16 pm
AutumnElf wrote:Round 2
((Set by Robert2100))
 Like watericesage, I can't think of anything more to say!
 Like watericesage, I can't think of anything more to say!
 
 
 Apart from being too long, it is alright. Not the best.
  Apart from being too long, it is alright. Not the best.
 
 Sorry!
 Sorry!
 I don't know what you mean by *flash* though. Do you mean something like fade, or is it just supposed to say '*flash*'?
 I don't know what you mean by *flash* though. Do you mean something like fade, or is it just supposed to say '*flash*'?
 Why is there never anything to say about the good entries??
  Why is there never anything to say about the good entries??  
  
 Definitely goes with the signature.
 Definitely goes with the signature.
Sat Apr 16, 2005 3:47 pm
maniac wrote:Qanda, "*flash* Beware: Armed baby on the loose! *flash*"
This is pretty goodI don't know what you mean by *flash* though. Do you mean something like fade, or is it just supposed to say '*flash*'?
Anyway... well done!
 By *flash* I meant that the subtext is flashing (or blinking), preferably red.
 By *flash* I meant that the subtext is flashing (or blinking), preferably red.   
			
				Sat Apr 16, 2005 3:56 pm
 
			
		Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:49 pm
hellyer wrote:Dawn2 wrote:hellyer wrote:*fade in*Small+Pink+Raygun=*fadeout and in*...Evil?*fade out* *repeat*
Deadline was on Tuesday.
Well I guess you couldn't include it then could you.
Sat Apr 16, 2005 5:58 pm
 
 You definetly saved yourself from last week.
 You definetly saved yourself from last week.
 I love it!
 I love it!
 
 I LURVE IT.
 I LURVE IT.
 
Sat Apr 16, 2005 11:43 pm
Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:00 am
 Yep...mine sucks...it wasn't trying to be humorous though...it was trying to be like...Wow...that is a horrible sig *flee*
 Yep...mine sucks...it wasn't trying to be humorous though...it was trying to be like...Wow...that is a horrible sig *flee*
			
		Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:16 pm
Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:22 pm
AutumnElf wrote:>___<
Sorry! I was sick this week, so I couldn't get on. Continue with the ratings though, just choose five people to eliminate this time. Hellyer, I'll accept your subtext as it's my own fault I didn't post myself on the deadline.
 I thought it was two per round normally?
 I thought it was two per round normally?
			
		Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:27 pm
Qanda wrote:AutumnElf wrote:>___<
Sorry! I was sick this week, so I couldn't get on. Continue with the ratings though, just choose five people to eliminate this time. Hellyer, I'll accept your subtext as it's my own fault I didn't post myself on the deadline.
5 people to eliminate?I thought it was two per round normally?
Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:34 pm
AutumnElf wrote:Actually, I start out with a number then go smaller on the number of people to eliminate depending on the number of people in the game. I would have had the judges choose five to eliminate last round, but three people missed the deadline so they would have been eliminated anyway.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:07 pm
AutumnElf wrote:Qanda wrote:AutumnElf wrote:>___<
Sorry! I was sick this week, so I couldn't get on. Continue with the ratings though, just choose five people to eliminate this time. Hellyer, I'll accept your subtext as it's my own fault I didn't post myself on the deadline.
5 people to eliminate?I thought it was two per round normally?
Actually, I start out with a number then go smaller on the number of people to eliminate depending on the number of people in the game. I would have had the judges choose five to eliminate last round, but three people missed the deadline so they would have been eliminated anyway.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:32 pm
Anubis wrote: I think five people is pretty heavy. Three would be better?
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:36 pm
Sun Apr 17, 2005 2:12 pm
loser1921 wrote:Anubis wrote: I think five people is pretty heavy. Three would be better?
I agree... but its not my contest...