WWX [End]

[Ammer]

Well, doesn't that suck.

I feel bad for o_0, he always dies on the first night.

[Alex]

Crud, 4 innocents lost >____< Kinda creepy that there's 4 deaths a night, though o.o

I'm kinda suspicious of Matt, though. The whole 'post the first letter of your name' thing seems rather fishy to me, as if it's some kind of post requirement (as others have mentioned).

Plus, o_0 was the only person to vote for Matt, and now he's dead. Coincidence?

Vote: Matt

Edited 'cause Alexy can't spell o.o

Last edited by Alex on Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

[Mandy]

Vote: Matt

I agree, I never really liked the idea of posting the first letter of your role name. Then dieing after voting for him is a pretty big co-incidence.

[Kugetsu]

Oh no, o_0's dead.
Killed by someone that's crazy in the head?
Looks like los locos have taken their toll
So Matt... what's the first letter of your role?

Vote - Matt

(Until something better arises)

[Anubis]

I agree. The fact that o_0 challenged Matt, and then he dies, along with that poor, poor camel, seems strange to me.

Vote: Matt

[TDG]

4 Deaths ?!?!? Two of which are dreamers ?!?!?! Holy...

[Christopher]

I've never seen a night with four innocent deaths. Probably just my lack of Scott games, all the games on randomness only have 20-25 people in them.

Vote: Matt

I'm going to have to go with the conjecture on this one.

[Qanda]

Vote: Jellyfish

Going with conjecture on this one too, I think she's bad.

[Matt]

The two people who died becuase they were in a state of shock were dreamers - They were obviously trying to dream about the same person which caused them to die - Who would be suspicious enough to warrant both the dreamers dreaimng? Well, me. You'll have to trust me on this, but I have no powers which kill dreamers, so there must be some outside role which affects this. To be honest, even if I did havew p[owers, it would be stupid to activate them becuase it puts suspicion on me.

Anyways, I have absoultely no evidence, but two people were most suspicious of me - Qanda and o_0. o_0 is dead, and he was the dreamer. I think that Qanda may be the nightmarer, and could maybe kill anyone who dreams of one person. He's almost encouraging people of voting for one person. Still, this hasn't got any evidence. This is also a possible theory, because the two people who dreamt of me - o_0 and Twixxy, I know out of the forum and they are much more likely to target me. People do that often.

I know it's hard, but I'm going to say ''Trust me''

I agree. The fact that o_0 challenged Matt, and then he dies, along with that poor, poor camel, seems strange to me.

I am not stupid. I realise that o_0 challenged me, and killing, had I had the powers, would be the last thing that I do. This immediately puts suspicion on me.

Qanda just said he agreed with everyone else, then voted for someone no-one had. I know Qanda is intelligent, and this isn't anything that he would normally do...

Vote: Qanda

[Qanda]

Anyways, I have absoultely no evidence, but two people were most suspicious of me - Qanda and o_0. o_0 is dead, and he was the dreamer. I think that Qanda may be the nightmarer, and could maybe kill anyone who dreams of one person. He's almost encouraging people of voting for one person. Still, this hasn't got any evidence. This is also a possible theory, because the two people who dreamt of me - o_0 and Twixxy, I know out of the forum and they are much more likely to target me. People do that often.

Ok, let's break down that large chunk of paragraph to see what you were really trying to say...

Both me and o_0 suspected your motives.

o_0 died.

Hence I killed o_0.

Ooookaaay...

Qanda just said he agreed with everyone else, then voted for someone no-one had. I know Qanda is intelligent, and this isn't anything that he would normally do...

Vote: Qanda

Well, my private convo with Jellyfish made me quite suspicious of her. Suffice to say that she intentionally misled me. In comparison, you were not as suspicious.

***

About the nightmare deaths, I am highly inclined to believe that that was not a direct killing, but rather a power which would make dreamers die if they dreamt of a particular person. I had that power in my Doom Castle game too. Matt himself believes that Twizz and o_0 would have dreamt of him, and I agree, since he was under suspicion yesterday.

This leads us to one noteworthy issue: In my game, the person with the nightmare power was a baddie (coincidentally, it was Matt, not that that means anything), and activated the power on himself to prevent himself from being dreamed of and killing the dreamer, thus killing two birds with one stone. If Matt was the dreaming target, there is a high chance of him being the baddie too.

[Matt]

Anyways, I have absoultely no evidence, but two people were most suspicious of me - Qanda and o_0. o_0 is dead, and he was the dreamer. I think that Qanda may be the nightmarer, and could maybe kill anyone who dreams of one person. He's almost encouraging people of voting for one person. Still, this hasn't got any evidence. This is also a possible theory, because the two people who dreamt of me - o_0 and Twixxy, I know out of the forum and they are much more likely to target me. People do that often.

Ok, let's break down that large chunk of paragraph to see what you were really trying to say...

Both me and o_0 suspected your motives.

I suspected Matt's motives, overall raising suspicion.

Suspicion caused people to dream of Matt

o_0 dreamed of Matt.

o_0 died.

Qanda influenced people to dream of Matt.

Hence I at the least, indrectly killed o_0.

Ooookaaay...

Adding in intermediate steps.

Qanda just said he agreed with everyone else, then voted for someone no-one had. I know Qanda is intelligent, and this isn't anything that he would normally do...

Vote: Qanda

Well, my private convo with Jellyfish made me quite suspicious of her. Suffice to say that she intentionally misled me. In comparison, you were not as suspicious.

Mate. Misunderstood 'conjecture' in your post, and thought you were merely agreeing with others. That's my mistake, and I'll hold my hands up to it. Still, maybe next time actually post your reasoning.

About the nightmare deaths, I am highly inclined to believe that that was not a direct killing, but rather a power which would make dreamers die if they dreamt of a particular person. I had that power in my Doom Castle game too. Matt himself believes that Twizz and o_0 would have dreamt of him, and I agree, since he was under suspicion yesterday.

This leads us to one noteworthy issue: In my game, the person with the nightmare power was a baddie (coincidentally, it was Matt, not that that means anything), and activated the power on himself to prevent himself from being dreamed of and killing the dreamer, thus killing two birds with one stone. If Matt was the dreaming target, there is a high chance of him being the baddie too.

If I were anyone else in this game, I would agree with you 100%. Alas, this isn't what happened. I know there is no incentive to believe me, but... Well... atleast try to.

[TDG]

The people that died of shock, maybe a poisoner type role ?? Though the odds of two dreamers and nothing else targetting somebody aren't thaqt high...

[EDIT] - Looking back through the thread, I've been acting mucho differently to normal. Mucho differento amigo...Dunno why though

[Qanda]

You acted suspiciously by trying to get everyone post the first letters of their role names.

Both me and o_0 suspected your motives.

I suspected your motives, overall raising suspicion.

Suspicion caused people to dream of you

o_0 dreamed of you.

o_0 died.

I influenced people to dream of you.

Hence I at the least, indrectly killed o_0.

Touche, Matt. Who was the primary cause for all this mayhem in the first place?

[jellyoflight]

Hate to say it, but I too am suspicious of Matt.

The whole 'first letter of your name' sounds a bit fishy - what real use would it be, everyone's roles would be pure guesswork. Also, it seems to me that it'd only be the baddies who would be so eager to know the name. Or perhaps Matt has something in his role involving the first letter of people's roles?

0_o dying shines a light on the whole thing. For me, anyway. You were the first to say on the sign-up thread that you would kill 0_o for a joke. 0_o voted for you. Both things could be used greatly to your advantage, if you did the whole double-bluff technique. You could easily say, "Even if I was a baddie, I wouldn't be stupid enough to kill 0_o." You have used a variation of this;

To be honest, even if I did havew p[owers, it would be stupid to activate them becuase it puts suspicion on me.

Ok, this is starting to sound like Murder, She Wrote. *addicted to that*

WHO WOULD BE CRUEL ENOUGH TO NAME THEIR CAMEL THAT?! :O


Vote: Matt

[Matt]

You were the first to say on the sign-up thread that you would kill 0_o for a joke.

Second. TDG said it first. I said I'd kill him to frame TDG.

Ok, this is starting to sound like Murder, She Wrote. *addicted to that*

Yeah, I went to o_0's house the day before, and planted a very springy spring under his bed. When he dreamt, he would be woken up in a big surprise, and this would propell him up to the ceiling. When he was at the ceiling, he would see a picture of a ghost I painted there, and have a nightmare.

To be honest, I'm suspicious of me as well. Everything points to me.

Still, becuase we can't unvote in this game, I guess I'll need to tell you my role. Well, I'm not too influencial to the innocents, but I still gave a big clue to my role. (The majority of you will not know what it is, so don't worry.) TDG, IIRC, should be the only one to know. -pokes-